process_results callback - PoC/WIP #2666
Conversation
|
I appreciate the eagerness of making Chosen better, but I think this is not very useful –except for you– because this requires a full reimplementation of the function, with option and option-group handling etc.. |
|
Well, for me and quite a few that commented on the parent issue, as well as other references to that issue as well. Although yes, I know, a handful. It was nice to see @davereid, a fellow Drupaler, commenting on #1647. I haven't really followed what's going on there but I must admin I haven't look properly, will do though. Well, I guess it's really the end of the road for something like this to be accepted. Will just comment one more thing on the parent issue and we can call it/close it if there's really no more work around it to be considered. |
Summary
An alternative to #2618 that simply allows for a custom process results callback to be set.
If something like this is really going to be considered, I'll improve/work on the documentation.
Please double-check that:
package.json.References