Skip to content

Conversation

leoniv
Copy link
Contributor

@leoniv leoniv commented Jun 17, 2022

Hi! It was easy to fix it, instead of submitting an issue. I faced the problem at 0.22 I suspect it's present at 0.23 too.

@mergify mergify bot added series/0.22 PRs targeting 0.22.x module:core labels Jun 17, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@FrancescoSerra FrancescoSerra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@danicheg danicheg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great. Thank you for your work!
A bit more context for readers - RFC declares that:

Inside the value part, characters not contained in attr-char are
encoded into an octet sequence using the specified character
encoding. That octet sequence is then percent-encoded as specified
in Section 2.1 of [RFC3986].

The whole PR is excellent a few minor suggestions:

@leoniv
Copy link
Contributor Author

leoniv commented Jun 20, 2022

@danicheg what about fix it in 0.23? I can submit another PR. WDYT?

@armanbilge
Copy link
Member

@leoniv thanks! No need to worry about that, after we merge this PR we will merge the series/0.22 branch into series/0.23 :)

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member

Thanks! 0.22 is officially EOL, but if it bothered you enough to fix there, it's easy enough for us to do a courtesy release there. I'll get that started.

@rossabaker rossabaker merged commit caa1914 into http4s:series/0.22 Jun 21, 2022
@leoniv
Copy link
Contributor Author

leoniv commented Jun 23, 2022

Thanks, we a little bit behind the progress :)

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member

v0.22.14 is releasing from CI now with this. I'll be asleep before it finishes. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module:core series/0.22 PRs targeting 0.22.x
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants