Changed DataFilter to fix an issue with the range property. #6631
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Changed DataFilter to fix an issue with the range property.
It was already correctly converting the range from Data which starts as an object:
{ min: 1, max: 100 }and is converted to an array[1, 100].But, it wasn't converting the
rangeproperty value similarly, until now. :)Where should the reviewer start?
the very beginning, it's a good place to start
What testing has been done on this PR?
added a unit test
How should this be manually tested?
manually
Do Jest tests follow these best practices?
followed existing test patterns
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant issues?
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Do the grommet docs need to be updated?
no
Should this PR be mentioned in the release notes?
yes
Is this change backwards compatible or is it a breaking change?
backwards compatible