Fix axe issues for ArrayOfFormFields #6464
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Should we be automatically setting |
good point we could or maybe a console warning for it? Im open to discussing either |
Good comment. Yea, we can optimize FormField to set That being said, we should also consider #6466 (comment) |
ericsoderberghp
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Fixes accessibility issues in storybook for ArrayOfFormFields
Where should the reviewer start?
storybook file
What testing has been done on this PR?
local
How should this be manually tested?
strorybook
Do Jest tests follow these best practices?
N/A
Any background context you want to provide?
nope
What are the relevant issues?
#4068 #6124
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Before
After
Do the grommet docs need to be updated?
no
Should this PR be mentioned in the release notes?
no
Is this change backwards compatible or is it a breaking change?
b-c