Drop the link of the k6 website from the user agent #4699
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The k6.io website has been deprecated, which initially required a link update. However, we reevaluated this decision and ultimately opted to remove the website from the user agent. We found no clear historical justification for its inclusion; it may have been for marketing purposes. Currently, we don't see any tangible benefits to keeping it.
mstoykov
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2025
joanlopez
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Drop the
https://k6.iolink from the user agent. In addition, renamek6toGrafana k6.Why?
The k6.io website has been deprecated, which initially required a link update. However, we reevaluated this decision and ultimately opted to remove the website from the user agent. We found no clear historical justification for its inclusion; it may have been for marketing purposes. Currently, we don't see any tangible benefits to keeping it.
Closes #4653