Skip to content

Move CSV output to internal as preparations for v1.0.0 #4675

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

mstoykov
Copy link
Contributor

@mstoykov mstoykov commented Apr 8, 2025

What?

Move the CSV output under internal package

Why?

Reducing public API

This was not moved before as a utility function IsStringInSlice used by a now not maintained extension:

As that dependency doesn't make any sense it was planned to be moved either way. But as the extension is now not maintained and has not merged previous PRs to fix breaking changes, it is even more of a reason to move forward.

Related to #4133

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have added tests for my changes.
  • I have run linter and tests locally (make check) and all pass.

Checklist: Documentation (only for k6 maintainers and if relevant)

Please do not merge this PR until the following items are filled out.

  • I have added the correct milestone and labels to the PR.
  • I have updated the release notes: link
  • I have updated or added an issue to the k6-documentation: grafana/k6-docs#NUMBER if applicable
  • I have updated or added an issue to the TypeScript definitions: grafana/k6-DefinitelyTyped#NUMBER if applicable

Related PR(s)/Issue(s)

This was not moved before as a utility function `IsStringInSlice` used
by a now not maintained extension:
- https://github.com/Maksimall89/xk6-output-clickhouse

As that dependency doesn't make any sense it was planned to be moved
either way. But as the extension is now not maintained and has not merged
previous PRs to fix breaking changes, it is even more of a reason to
move forward.

Related to #4133
@mstoykov mstoykov added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Apr 8, 2025
@mstoykov mstoykov requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2025 08:31
@mstoykov mstoykov requested review from inancgumus and oleiade and removed request for a team April 8, 2025 08:31
@mstoykov mstoykov added the breaking change for PRs that need to be mentioned in the breaking changes section of the release notes label Apr 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@oleiade oleiade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@mstoykov mstoykov merged commit f24c43f into master Apr 9, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@mstoykov mstoykov deleted the moveCSVOutput branch April 9, 2025 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change for PRs that need to be mentioned in the breaking changes section of the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants