Support file scheme in open and experimental fs #4513
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
d3333e2 to
759ea7c
Compare
95e58e9 to
8207df7
Compare
inancgumus
previously approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
This apparently has never been supported which is likely due to nothing really returning absolute paths. After adding import.meta.resolve though this is changed. And there is really no reason why it shouldn't be supported. Fixes #4512
859bf8f to
4a6b030
Compare
inancgumus
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
oleiade
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Fix
openand experimentalfs.openandgrpc.Client#Loadto work with file scheme pathsFixes #4512
Why?
This apparently has never been supported which is likely due to nothing really returning absolute paths.
After adding import.meta.resolve though this is changed. And there is really no reason why it shouldn't be supported.
Checklist
make lint) and all checks pass.make tests) and all tests pass.Related PR(s)/Issue(s)