You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2017. It is now read-only.
My understanding of how scopes work is similar to layers of transparencies; when something isn't addressed by the most specific scope, HTTPSB should look through the blank spots to what's underneath.
An example on https://plus.google.com: On the * scope I have previously whitelisted YouTube so that embedded videos play everywhere:
Now I switch to the *.google.com scope to whitelist cookies, but look what happened: I've lost the whitelisting of YouTube:
Now I switch to the plus.google.com scope to blacklist talkgadget because it slows Google+ too much, but now I've lost the cookies AND YouTube. It also shows 7 changes were made to this scope, rather than 1.
What am I not understanding? I expect YouTube to be whitelisted on all scopes of google.com because it's whitelisted on *, and the more specific scopes for Google don't overwrite that. I expect plus.google.com to also be transparent to the lower levels and allow cookies and YouTube because they weren't overwritten either.