-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
Adds explicit permissions for github workflows #4161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TIL!
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: 9efebf02-81a6-4d88-8223-0062b76c8539 Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
It seems that the pipeline is always having issue on the standard-upgrade-test-cluster-1-31:
https://github.com/googleforgames/agones/blob/main/cloudbuild.yaml#L397 The output of the k8s 1.31 seems to be |
Agreed - seems rather flaky. @igooch does it make sense to |
I was looking at the code, from what I understand, it reuses an existing cluster to do the upgrade test ( |
Yes, the logs are rather verbose, but if we're OK with that we can do a dump of the For this build it looks like it fails during upgrade from 1.44 -> 1.45. Install of 1.45 begins:
Ongoing creating of 1.44 game servers continues:
Creating of 1.44 game servers temporarily fails (expected) while the controller service switches to the new endpoint during upgrade:
Failure continues for longer than expected, and the test fails:
Looking at the controller logs, it's possible the slow upgrade was due to a node not being ready, although there's a 5 min difference in time on the logs, so it may be unrelated.
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind hotfix
What this PR does / Why we need it:
GitHub is now enforcing explicit permissions in workflows, causing the labeler and pr_update workflows to fail.
This adds the permissions to write to a PR, using the same permissions as the existing labeler-pr workflow.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
NA
Special notes for your reviewer: