Skip to content

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Nov 4, 2016

The packages are BigQuery, Datastore, Logging, Pub/Sub and Storage.

The rename is in advance of a larger re-factor (#2606). But so long as the connections are not public, the re-factor can happen without user-facing implications.

I'd also like to make all the connection attributes on instances into _connection. @tseaver Is it OK to put that change in this PR?

The packages are BigQuery, Datastore, Logging, Pub/Sub
and Storage.

The rename is in advance of a larger re-factor. But so
long as the connections are not public, the re-factor
can happen without user-facing implications.
@dhermes dhermes added the hygiene label Nov 4, 2016
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Nov 4, 2016
Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, however you decide about the datastore.batch.Batch.connection property.

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ def namespace(self):
def connection(self):
"""Getter for connection over which the batch will run.

:rtype: :class:`google.cloud.datastore.connection.Connection`
:rtype: :class:`google.cloud.datastore._http.Connection`
:returns: The connection over which the batch will run.
"""
return self._client.connection

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@dhermes dhermes merged commit a52010e into googleapis:master Nov 7, 2016
@dhermes dhermes deleted the make-connection-non-public branch November 7, 2016 22:41
richkadel pushed a commit to richkadel/google-cloud-python that referenced this pull request May 6, 2017
…ublic

Renaming connection module as _http in 5 packages.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants