-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 822
support for atomic writes for gcp #3523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support for atomic writes for gcp #3523
Conversation
@jba FYI |
2a9a605
to
0ab460e
Compare
@jba just a friendly reminder if you can take a look at this PR. I have also added mongo implementation as well, enabled al the conformance tests. |
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
Please address failing checks. |
@jba it should be good now. thanks! |
3d7ba74
to
42f717d
Compare
@jba runchecks on local are good except some kafka failures due to connection issues which is unrelated to this PR. Can you please retrigger the workflow for me? Or maybe you can give me a permission to trigger the workflow ? |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3523 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.26% 73.29% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 15079 15190 +111
==========================================
+ Hits 11048 11134 +86
- Misses 3265 3277 +12
- Partials 766 779 +13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
The CI seems to be good now, please help to merge when you get chance, thank you! |
@jba just a reminder to merge if this is good to go, thanks! |
Please use a title starting with the name of the affected package, or "all",
followed by a colon, followed by a short summary of the issue. Example:
blob/gcsblob: fix typo in documentation
.Please reference any Issue related to this Pull Request. Example:
Fixes #1
.See
here
for tips on good Pull Request description.