Skip to content

Conversation

jswrenn
Copy link
Collaborator

@jswrenn jswrenn commented Feb 6, 2025

This edit brings the structure of these docs in line with that used for our other derives.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.46%. Comparing base (3ad056b) to head (f10667e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on v0.8.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           v0.8.x    #2306   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.46%   87.46%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        6134     6136    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         5365     5367    +2     
  Misses        769      769           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This edit brings the structure of these docs in line with that
used for our other derives.
@jswrenn jswrenn force-pushed the derive-doc-cleanup branch from f10667e to a9faae2 Compare March 24, 2025 20:19
@jswrenn jswrenn requested a review from joshlf March 24, 2025 20:25
@jswrenn jswrenn enabled auto-merge March 24, 2025 20:25
@jswrenn jswrenn added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 24, 2025
Merged via the queue into v0.8.x with commit 9c50f05 Mar 24, 2025
87 checks passed
@jswrenn jswrenn deleted the derive-doc-cleanup branch March 24, 2025 21:01
google-pr-creation-bot pushed a commit to google-pr-creation-bot/zerocopy that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
This edit brings the structure of these docs in line with that
used for our other derives.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
This edit brings the structure of these docs in line with that
used for our other derives.

Co-authored-by: Jack Wrenn <jswrenn@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants