Skip to content

Conversation

rfwatson
Copy link
Contributor

Ensure g.repo is not nil after a failed migration, this allows the cleanup here to be triggered as expected.

Fixes #7039

@rfwatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there any docs for setting up integration tests locally? I'll add a test case if I can get them running

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label May 25, 2019
@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

make test-sqlite will run the integration tests on sqlite which is probably all you need to run unless you're very keen.

I think CONTRIBUTING.md has some information about how to run drone to perform a pull-request check.

drone exec --local --build-event pull_request

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels May 25, 2019
@zeripath zeripath added this to the 1.9.0 milestone May 25, 2019
@rfwatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks.

Out of interest, is there a reason we don’t rollback a database transaction here, instead of cleaning up manually?

@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

It's not in a transaction unfortunately. Keeping it in a transaction would cause the entire database to be locked whilst you're migrating potentially large repositories.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 25, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #7040 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7040      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.45%   41.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         442      442              
  Lines       59597    59597              
==========================================
- Hits        24703    24701       -2     
- Misses      31665    31667       +2     
  Partials     3229     3229
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/migrations/gitea.go 8.3% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
models/repo_list.go 72.08% <0%> (-1.02%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 355ab0c...e7240e9. Read the comment docs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 25, 2019
@zeripath zeripath merged commit daaae2a into go-gitea:master May 25, 2019
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented May 26, 2019

@rfwatson good catch.

jeffliu27 pushed a commit to jeffliu27/gitea that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2019
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Failed migration leaves database in a bad state
6 participants