Skip to content

Fix shabox regression #22924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

Fix shabox regression #22924

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

Gusted
Copy link
Contributor

@Gusted Gusted commented Feb 15, 2023

@yardenshoham yardenshoham added the issue/regression Indicates a previously functioning feature or behavior that has broken or regressed after a change label Feb 15, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Feb 15, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 16, 2023
@lunny lunny merged commit 3f318a4 into go-gitea:main Feb 16, 2023
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2023
@zjjhot
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main'
1d64f5a 
* upstream/main:
  Fix shabox regression (go-gitea#22924)
  fix incorrect role labels for migrated issues and comments (go-gitea#22914)
  Always show the `command line instructions` button even if there are conflicts (go-gitea#22909)
  Remove thehowl from maintainers (go-gitea#22917)
  Add context cache as a request level cache (go-gitea#22294)
  Add tooltip to issue reference (go-gitea#22913)
@Gusted Gusted deleted the shabox branch February 16, 2023 07:51
@yardenshoham yardenshoham mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Closed
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@lunny lunny lunny approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@zeripath zeripath zeripath approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
issue/regression Indicates a previously functioning feature or behavior that has broken or regressed after a change lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@Gusted @lunny @zeripath @yardenshoham @GiteaBot