-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 527
feat: Support for Kubernetes v1.33 #12216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Support for Kubernetes v1.33 #12216
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Skimmed over it - looks good! :)
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 851fdc6079d9b44ce209431f88634a84cb0a107a
|
/assign |
/assign |
0c8a07e
to
f0881da
Compare
f0881da
to
82bb801
Compare
/retest |
Co-authored-by: Kostov6 <v.kostov@sap.com>
Testing with a workerless shoot with version 1.32 ``` k -n shoot--local--local-wl logs kube-controller-manager-5d75d66f-8qmvz | tail -n 1 E0529 09:15:38.793384 1 run.go:72] "command failed" err="\"device-taint-eviction-controller\" is not in the list of known controllers" ``` This is because in the KCM deployment device-taint-eviction-controller was specified in the command line flags as a controller to be disabled, more specifically as -device-taint-eviction-controller Co-authored-by: Kostov6 <v.kostov@sap.com>
fb04740
to
bdf51bf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the well-structured PR!
I am posting preliminary comments. I will continue with the review tomorrow.
6337bcb
to
dac0234
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks awesome! Let's resolve the open comments and include this PR for Gardener v1.122.
Overall, all my comments are doc and wording suggestions in the new-kubernetes-version.md
guide (the previous review from yesterday), and a single suggestion in the shoot_kubernetes_versions.md
guide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: c4809dcad49af238bcceec2660161e9ec645037a
|
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ialidzhikov The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
/retest-required |
How to categorize this PR?
/area open-source
/kind enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
Support for Kubernetes v1.33.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #11933
Special notes for your reviewer:
Note: please check the last commit before the
chore: Maintain kube-controller-manager controllers
commit as they are relatedWe performed the changes by following the new Kubernetes version guide and comparing how changes have been done for previous Kubernetes versions, e.g., #11197. We also used a new version of
compare-k8s-feature-gates.sh
, introduced with #12109.Code changes have been tested in the following scenarios using the local provider:
Related PR for Network Policy issue found during local testing: #12215
Release note: