-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 527
Add check for rolling update in CheckNodesScaling
#11869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add check for rolling update in CheckNodesScaling
#11869
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the improvement 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: d3a71c6108bf0e74ed39b546766e6bf13b6f6a72
|
/retest |
Do you still plan to check this PR @Kostov6? Otherwise, I'll approve. |
Today I'll take a final look at it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's use NodesRollOutScalingUp
instead. Otherwise lgtm
Let me also have a quick look a bit later tonight :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for taking care of this.
/lgtm
Just a small typo that you could fix.
/lgtm @timuthy leaving the approval to you :) |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: edb1a26253ea1a48a279e25cbf283d104211d522
|
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: timuthy The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
How to categorize this PR?
/area quality
/kind enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is the implementation for the agreed upon #11084 (comment)
test run:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #10227
Special notes for your reviewer:
cc @plkokanov @Kostov6
Release note: