Skip to content

Conversation

ekoops
Copy link
Contributor

@ekoops ekoops commented Apr 18, 2025

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area API-version

/area build

/area CI

/area driver-kmod

/area driver-bpf

/area driver-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-bpf

/area libscap-engine-gvisor

/area libscap-engine-kmod

/area libscap-engine-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-nodriver

/area libscap-engine-noop

/area libscap-engine-source-plugin

/area libscap-engine-savefile

/area libscap

/area libpman

/area libsinsp

/area tests

/area proposals

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

/version driver-API-version-major

/version driver-API-version-minor

/version driver-API-version-patch

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-major

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-minor

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-patch

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR is part of a series #2343.
This PR adds a timestamper component handling timestamps caching and generation. The addition of this component is a preliminary step needed for decoupling other components like sinsp_thread_manager and sinsp_usergroup_manager from sinsp.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Add `timestamper` component handling timestamp caching and
generation. The addition of this component is a preliminary step
needed for decoupling other components like `sinsp_thread_manager`
and `sinsp_usergroup_manager` from `sinsp`.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <leonardodigiovanna1@gmail.com>
Copy link

Perf diff from master - unit tests

     6.26%     +0.43%  [.] sinsp::next
     0.69%     -0.39%  [.] sinsp_evt::get_direction
     5.38%     +0.31%  [.] sinsp_evt::get_type
     3.62%     +0.30%  [.] next_event_from_file
    34.89%     -0.27%  [.] sinsp_thread_manager::create_thread_dependencies
     1.22%     -0.24%  [.] user_group_updater::user_group_updater
     0.76%     +0.22%  [.] libsinsp::sinsp_suppress::process_event
     1.60%     +0.20%  [.] sinsp_parser::process_event
     0.57%     -0.20%  [.] sinsp_fdtable::find
     1.47%     +0.20%  [.] is_conversion_needed

Heap diff from master - unit tests

peak heap memory consumption: -8B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Heap diff from master - scap file

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Benchmarks diff from master

Comparing gbench_data.json to /root/actions-runner/_work/libs/libs/build/gbench_data.json
Benchmark                                                         Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_sinsp_split_mean                                            -0.0142         -0.0142           152           149           152           149
BM_sinsp_split_median                                          -0.0148         -0.0148           152           149           152           149
BM_sinsp_split_stddev                                          -0.6776         -0.6780             1             0             1             0
BM_sinsp_split_cv                                              -0.6729         -0.6733             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_mean                  -0.1228         -0.1227            64            56            64            56
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_median                -0.1241         -0.1241            64            56            64            56
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_stddev                +0.5852         +0.5839             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_cv                    +0.8071         +0.8055             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_mean                     -0.0086         -0.0086            25            25            25            25
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_median                   -0.0068         -0.0068            25            25            25            25
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_stddev                   -0.4057         -0.4060             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_cv                       -0.4006         -0.4009             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_mean                  -0.0680         -0.0680            61            57            61            57
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_median                -0.0668         -0.0668            61            57            61            57
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_stddev                -0.3614         -0.3614             1             1             1             1
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_cv                    -0.3148         -0.3148             0             0             0             0

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.04%. Comparing base (24539f5) to head (0d2f8f0).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2362   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.04%   77.04%           
=======================================
  Files         228      229    +1     
  Lines       30324    30331    +7     
  Branches     4654     4654           
=======================================
+ Hits        23363    23370    +7     
  Misses       6961     6961           
Flag Coverage Δ
libsinsp 77.04% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@FedeDP
Copy link
Contributor

FedeDP commented Apr 22, 2025

/milestone 0.21.0

@poiana poiana added this to the 0.21.0 milestone Apr 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Apr 22, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ekoops, FedeDP

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Apr 22, 2025

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 9963ea97af5c4e3281ffa395c60540523111d796

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to In progress in Falco Roadmap Apr 23, 2025
@poiana poiana merged commit 997bf75 into falcosecurity:master Apr 23, 2025
47 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in Falco Roadmap Apr 23, 2025
@ekoops ekoops deleted the ekoops/timestamper branch April 23, 2025 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants