-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
fix(driver/bpf): fixed small verifier bug in old bpf probe. #2281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <nierro92@gmail.com>
Please double check driver/SCHEMA_VERSION file. See versioning. /hold |
/milestone next-driver |
/unhold |
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
Benchmarks diff from master
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2281 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.33% 75.32% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 280 280
Lines 34556 34556
Branches 5901 5902 +1
==========================================
- Hits 26032 26031 -1
- Misses 8524 8525 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
X64 kernel testing matrix
ARM64 kernel testing matrix
|
The modern bpf is broken in master too :/ |
It seems like #2255 is the culprit. Will investigate it further since initially the PR did not trigger any failure (you can see the edits on the kernel testing matrix comment: #2255 (comment)) EDIT: opened #2282 to fix it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
great catch
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Rather than passing the mode directly, introduce a new enum that describes both the mode and the platform to use. Fixes: falcosecurity#2281 Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Nosek <grzegorz.nosek@sysdig.com>
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area driver-bpf
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
On my machine, the currect bpf probe code caused a verifier bug:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: