Skip to content

refactor(tests): migrate itext tests from qunit to vitest #10555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 20, 2025
Merged

refactor(tests): migrate itext tests from qunit to vitest #10555

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 20, 2025

Conversation

Smrtnyk
Copy link
Contributor

@Smrtnyk Smrtnyk commented Apr 19, 2025

migrates itext tests to vitest

@codesandbox CodeSandbox
Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Apr 19, 2025

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders

Open Preview

@Smrtnyk Smrtnyk changed the title convert itext refactor(tests): migrate itext tests from qunit to vitest Apr 19, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Build Stats

file / KB (diff) bundled minified
fabric 913.863 (0) 301.232 (0)

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading 


> fabric@6.6.2 coverage:report:ci
> nyc report --reporter=text-summary


=============================== Coverage summary ===============================
Statements   : 75.56% ( 21718/28739 )
Branches     : 61.26% ( 4165/6798 )
Functions    : 86.75% ( 1565/1804 )
Lines        : 80.25% ( 16625/20715 )
================================================================================

@asturur asturur merged commit eff9f41 into fabricjs:master Apr 20, 2025
@Smrtnyk Smrtnyk deleted the itext branch April 20, 2025 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@asturur asturur asturur approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Smrtnyk @asturur