Add UMD #49
Merged
Add UMD #49
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vjeux
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2015
|
Nice! Thanks |
|
Hmm, would it be better to leave this package as CommonJS and treat umd as a build target? |
|
@petehunt do you know what's the standard procedure for this? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make it work...... everywhere!
Putting computeLayout in the IIFE right away broke the transpiler for me. Nevertheless, I think using an out of the box UMD pattern makes sense here. I don't see a reason why css-layout shouldn't be script loader agnostic.