refactor: use CustomRuleDefinitionType in JSONRuleDefinition
#121
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
snitin315
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Simplify type definitions.
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
JSONRuleDefinitionusing the coreCustomRuleDefinitionTypetype.JSONRuleDefinitionTypeOptionsas an alias for the coreCustomRuleTypeDefinitionstype.@eslint/coreto v0.15.Related Issues
refs eslint/rewrite#177
Related PRs: eslint/eslint#19949, eslint/css#203, eslint/markdown#471
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?