Skip to content

Conversation

nbetm
Copy link

@nbetm nbetm commented Aug 19, 2017

This PR is based on #156 and #158. The only difference is that it only
introduces the autocmd. So we can leave the shim loading optimization
for later.

This PR is based on #156 and #158. The only difference is that it only
introduces the autocmd. So we can leave the shim loading optimization
for later.
@equalsraf
Copy link
Owner

Actually I was intending to do this upstream neovim/neovim#6917 but i never got to finish it.

@jeaye
Copy link

jeaye commented Sep 26, 2017

Any update on this?

@equalsraf
Copy link
Owner

equalsraf commented Sep 27, 2017

errr, nope, rebased but I dont have tests. If anyone wants to spin off the upstream PR, have a go at it

@jeaye
Copy link

jeaye commented Sep 27, 2017

It sounds like you're not open to merging this PR and would instead do this upstream. If that's so, can we close this? If not, can we merge so people can take advantage of the hook.

@equalsraf
Copy link
Owner

Correct, I would prefer to see this upstream. There is little benefit to rushing it here, since you can also do it as a hack inside ginit.vim. Also one of the original points of #156 can only be fixed upstream.

@suy
Copy link

suy commented Sep 28, 2017

To me the changes in #158 did fix all what I expected, so it was good enough to have it merged here, and wait for an upstream solution with some easy workaround. Your pull request in neovim looked fine enough for me. Without being familiar with their internals, though. And there were tests, isn't it? I don't see what's missing there.

@equalsraf
Copy link
Owner

@suy still missing that last comment neovim/neovim#6917 (comment) and the asserts are wrong and break the build.

@jgehrig
Copy link
Collaborator

jgehrig commented May 28, 2021

Closing this PR, since the behavior was implemented upstream with UIEnter and UILeave.

@jgehrig jgehrig closed this May 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants