Skip to content

Conversation

haesbaert
Copy link
Contributor

We made 8.x a should for the same field in
4fa0abd.

As discussed in #2383 (comment) we are making this a must for 9.x.

We made 8.x a `should` for the same field in
4fa0abd.

As discussed in #2383 (comment)
we are making this a `must` for 9.x.
@haesbaert haesbaert requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2024 08:55
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Documentation changes preview: https://ecs_bk_2398.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/diff

@haesbaert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mjwolf can we just merge this? no extra steps for breaking I guess?

@mjwolf
Copy link
Contributor

mjwolf commented Nov 21, 2024

@mjwolf can we just merge this? no extra steps for breaking I guess?

Yes, it can be merged anytime

@haesbaert haesbaert merged commit 4fd9584 into main Nov 22, 2024
4 checks passed
@mjwolf mjwolf deleted the x509.serial_number-must branch February 12, 2025 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants