Skip to content

Conversation

lukmccall
Copy link

Follow up from expo/expo#7717

@lukmccall lukmccall requested a review from brentvatne April 7, 2020 15:28
@brentvatne
Copy link
Member

brentvatne commented Apr 7, 2020

let's not merge this in to sdk-37 branch - we can keep using the polyfill for sdk-37 and instead just use this code in sdk-38+.

@ide - what branch should this be merged into?

@ide
Copy link
Member

ide commented Apr 7, 2020

If we're not looking to make changes to SDK 37 and want the changes to apply to SDK 38 and onwards, this should go on master (and if the sdk-38 branch had been cut, then that branch too, but that's not the case right now).

@lukmccall lukmccall changed the base branch from sdk-37 to master April 8, 2020 10:37
@lukmccall lukmccall changed the base branch from master to sdk-master April 8, 2020 10:38
@lukmccall lukmccall changed the base branch from sdk-master to sdk-37 April 8, 2020 10:38
@lukmccall
Copy link
Author

@brentvatne, @ide I need more clarification. I was aware of that we don't want to apply this to branch SDK-37. However, I wasn't sure where it should be merged.

So, if this change was only made on the branch SDK-37, that means it won't be applied to the future SDK-38 branch? Moreover, the master branch looks like it's not up to date. As well as the SDK-master branch.

@ide
Copy link
Member

ide commented Apr 8, 2020

Oh, sorry, I thought this was the expo repo. If we want this change to apply to sdk-38, which doesn't have the polyfill anyway, then we need to remember not to cherry-pick the commit that added the polyfill when we're creating the sdk-38 branch. (This is why cherry-picked commits are so expensive.)

@ide
Copy link
Member

ide commented Apr 8, 2020

In short, I think we don't need to merge this PR to any branch, but we do need to remember this change when making the sdk-38 branch.

@brentvatne
Copy link
Member

ok let's just leave it open then!

@brentvatne brentvatne closed this Sep 2, 2020
gabrieldonadel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
…tion for existing view (facebook#51294)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#51294

changelog: [internal]

Fix a crash where a node that is supposed to be culled doesn't get visited because culling context is not updated.
The differentiator would generate a create instruction for a view that already exists.

Stack trace for the crash:
```
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
  * frame #0: 0x0000000111740874 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 8
    frame #1: 0x00000001117aa2ec libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 264
    frame #2: 0x0000000180171ea8 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 100
    frame #3: 0x00000001802b0144 libc++abi.dylib`abort_message + 128
    frame #4: 0x000000018029fe4c libc++abi.dylib`demangling_terminate_handler() + 296
    frame #5: 0x000000018006f220 libobjc.A.dylib`_objc_terminate() + 124
    frame #6: 0x00000001375d1964 INFRAFramework`meta_terminate() + 5468
    frame #7: 0x00000001802af570 libc++abi.dylib`std::__terminate(void (*)()) + 12
    frame #8: 0x00000001802b2498 libc++abi.dylib`__cxxabiv1::failed_throw(__cxxabiv1::__cxa_exception*) + 32
    frame #9: 0x00000001802b2478 libc++abi.dylib`__cxa_throw + 88
    frame #10: 0x0000000180093904 libobjc.A.dylib`objc_exception_throw + 384
    frame #11: 0x0000000180e6999c Foundation`-[NSAssertionHandler handleFailureInFunction:file:lineNumber:description:] + 268
    frame #12: 0x000000031a3bcfc8 XPLAT_6_Framework`-[RCTComponentViewRegistry dequeueComponentViewWithComponentHandle:tag:] + 528
    frame #13: 0x000000031a3ccdec XPLAT_6_Framework`RCTPerformMountInstructions(std::__1::vector<facebook::react::ShadowViewMutation, std::__1::allocator<facebook::react::ShadowViewMutation>> const&, RCTComponentViewRegistry*, RCTMountingTransactionObserverCoordinator&, int) + 356
    frame #14: 0x000000031a3ccc7c XPLAT_6_Framework`-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1::operator()(facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&) const + 80
    frame #15: 0x000000031a3ccc20 XPLAT_6_Framework`decltype(std::declval<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1&>()(std::declval<facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&>(), std::declval<facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:ne190102]<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1&, facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&>(-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1&, facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&) + 40
    frame #16: 0x000000031a3ccbc8 XPLAT_6_Framework`void std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<void, true>::__call[abi:ne190102]<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1&, facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&>(-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1&, facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&) + 40
    frame #17: 0x000000031a3ccb94 XPLAT_6_Framework`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1, std::__1::allocator<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1>, void (facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&)>::operator()[abi:ne190102](facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&) + 44
    frame #18: 0x000000031a3cba1c XPLAT_6_Framework`std::__1::__function::__func<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1, std::__1::allocator<-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:]::$_1>, void (facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&)>::operator()(facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&) + 44
    frame #20: 0x000000032f219804 XPLAT_1_Framework`std::__1::function<void (facebook::react::MountingTransaction const&, facebook::react::SurfaceTelemetry const&)>::operator()(this=0x000000016d4f0c78, __arg=0x000000016d4f0a10, __arg=0x000000016d4f0978) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #21: 0x000000032f219668 XPLAT_1_Framework`facebook::react::TelemetryController::pullTransaction(this=0x00000003f4680f00, willMount=0x000000016d4f0c98, doMount=0x000000016d4f0c78, didMount=0x000000016d4f0c58) const at TelemetryController.cpp:39:3
    frame #22: 0x000000031a3c5b28 XPLAT_6_Framework`-[RCTMountingManager performTransaction:] + 544
    frame #23: 0x000000031a3c5864 XPLAT_6_Framework`-[RCTMountingManager initiateTransaction:] + 456
    frame #24: 0x000000031a3c5240 XPLAT_6_Framework`__42-[RCTMountingManager scheduleTransaction:]_block_invoke + 308
    frame #25: 0x0000000131f81b84 BOTTOMFramework`__RCTExecuteOnMainQueue_block_invoke + 40
    frame #26: 0x000000018017c788 libdispatch.dylib`_dispatch_call_block_and_release + 24
    frame #27: 0x0000000180197278 libdispatch.dylib`_dispatch_client_callout + 12
    frame #28: 0x00000001801b2fcc libdispatch.dylib`_dispatch_main_queue_drain.cold.7 + 24
    frame #29: 0x000000018018c1c4 libdispatch.dylib`_dispatch_main_queue_drain + 1184
    frame #30: 0x000000018018bd14 libdispatch.dylib`_dispatch_main_queue_callback_4CF + 40
    frame #31: 0x0000000180427fec CoreFoundation`__CFRUNLOOP_IS_SERVICING_THE_MAIN_DISPATCH_QUEUE__ + 12
    frame #32: 0x00000001804229f8 CoreFoundation`__CFRunLoopRun + 1920
    frame #33: 0x0000000180421e3c CoreFoundation`CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 536
    frame #34: 0x0000000190f62d00 GraphicsServices`GSEventRunModal + 164
    frame #35: 0x0000000185bcec98 UIKitCore`-[UIApplication _run] + 796
    frame #36: 0x0000000185bd3064 UIKitCore`UIApplicationMain + 124
    frame #37: 0x0000000115fbf0bc PRODUCTFramework`main + 200
    frame #38: 0x00000001114293d8 dyld_sim`start_sim + 20
    frame #39: 0x0000000111506b4c dyld`start + 6000
```

Reviewed By: rubennorte

Differential Revision: D74654157

fbshipit-source-id: 9181bcd28524c71d0ca4620bd630dc0baa172386
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants