Skip to content

Conversation

GAtom22
Copy link
Contributor

@GAtom22 GAtom22 commented Sep 9, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • tackled an existing issue or discussed with a team member
  • left instructions on how to review the changes
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required.
Please add a note if the item is not applicable
and please add your handle next to the items reviewed
if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • confirmed that this PR does not change production code
  • reviewed content
  • tested instructions (if applicable)
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated comments across various files to enhance clarity regarding linting directives and suppress specific security warnings.
  • Chores

    • Added //nolint:gosec // G115 comments to multiple functions to indicate intentional bypassing of certain linting warnings without altering functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across various files, primarily focusing on updating comments to suppress specific linting warnings related to security checks. The changes involve replacing existing lint directives with more explicit annotations or adding new comments to indicate that certain lines should be exempt from static analysis warnings. The overall functionality of the affected methods and tests remains unchanged.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/ante/evm/12_emit_event.go, app/ante/evm/mono.go Updated comments for txIdx variable to suppress gosec warnings G115 and G701.
ibc/testing/endpoint.go Added comment to zeroTimestamp variable to ignore gosec warning G115.
indexer/kv_indexer.go Added comments to suppress gosec warning G115 for TxIndexKey function.
precompiles/authorization/events.go, precompiles/distribution/events.go, precompiles/erc20/events.go, precompiles/staking/events.go, precompiles/ics20/events.go Added //nolint:gosec // G115 comments to BlockNumber assignments in various event emission functions.
precompiles/distribution/events_test.go, precompiles/staking/events_test.go, precompiles/erc20/events_test.go, precompiles/vesting/events_test.go, rpc/backend/blocks_test.go, rpc/backend/tx_info.go, x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go Added //nolint:gosec // G115 comments to assertions comparing block numbers in various test functions.
rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go, rpc/backend/blocks.go, rpc/backend/node_info.go, rpc/backend/utils.go, x/inflation/v1/keeper/epoch_info.go Updated comments to suppress gosec warnings for various lines of code.
tests/e2e/upgrade/manager.go, testutil/integration/evmos/network/network.go, testutil/integration/evmos/utils/genesis.go, testutil/tx/eth.go, types/int.go, x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go, x/evm/keeper/keeper.go, x/inflation/v1/keeper/hooks_test.go Added or updated comments to suppress specific gosec warnings in various functions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant Linter
    participant Codebase

    Developer->>Codebase: Update comments to suppress lint warnings
    Codebase->>Linter: Run static analysis
    Linter-->>Codebase: Ignore specified warnings
    Codebase-->>Developer: Maintain functionality
Loading

🐰 In the code where I hop and play,
Linting rules kept worries at bay.
With comments clear, I skip the fuss,
My code is safe, no need to rush!
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
For clean code brings us all good cheer! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@GAtom22 GAtom22 marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2024 20:10
@GAtom22 GAtom22 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2024 20:10
@GAtom22 GAtom22 requested review from MalteHerrmann and 0xstepit and removed request for a team September 9, 2024 20:10
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4265aa3 and 069ef83.

Files selected for processing (36)
  • app/ante/evm/12_emit_event.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/mono.go (1 hunks)
  • ibc/testing/endpoint.go (1 hunks)
  • indexer/kv_indexer.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/authorization/events.go (2 hunks)
  • precompiles/distribution/events.go (5 hunks)
  • precompiles/distribution/events_test.go (5 hunks)
  • precompiles/erc20/events.go (2 hunks)
  • precompiles/erc20/events_test.go (2 hunks)
  • precompiles/ics20/events.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/staking/events.go (8 hunks)
  • precompiles/staking/events_test.go (7 hunks)
  • precompiles/staking/tx_test.go (5 hunks)
  • precompiles/staking/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/testutil/events.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/vesting/events.go (7 hunks)
  • precompiles/vesting/tx_test.go (2 hunks)
  • precompiles/vesting/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go (2 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/blocks.go (2 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/blocks_test.go (2 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/node_info.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/tx_info.go (7 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/utils.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/types/events.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/types/utils.go (3 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/upgrade/manager.go (1 hunks)
  • testutil/integration/evmos/network/network.go (1 hunks)
  • testutil/integration/evmos/utils/genesis.go (1 hunks)
  • testutil/tx/eth.go (1 hunks)
  • types/int.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go (3 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go (3 hunks)
  • x/inflation/v1/keeper/epoch_info.go (1 hunks)
  • x/inflation/v1/keeper/hooks_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (35)
  • app/ante/evm/12_emit_event.go
  • ibc/testing/endpoint.go
  • indexer/kv_indexer.go
  • precompiles/authorization/events.go
  • precompiles/distribution/events.go
  • precompiles/distribution/events_test.go
  • precompiles/erc20/events.go
  • precompiles/erc20/events_test.go
  • precompiles/ics20/events.go
  • precompiles/staking/events.go
  • precompiles/staking/events_test.go
  • precompiles/staking/tx_test.go
  • precompiles/staking/utils_test.go
  • precompiles/testutil/events.go
  • precompiles/vesting/events.go
  • precompiles/vesting/tx_test.go
  • precompiles/vesting/utils_test.go
  • rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go
  • rpc/backend/blocks.go
  • rpc/backend/blocks_test.go
  • rpc/backend/node_info.go
  • rpc/backend/tx_info.go
  • rpc/backend/utils.go
  • rpc/types/events.go
  • rpc/types/utils.go
  • tests/e2e/upgrade/manager.go
  • testutil/integration/evmos/network/network.go
  • testutil/integration/evmos/utils/genesis.go
  • testutil/tx/eth.go
  • types/int.go
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go
  • x/evm/keeper/keeper.go
  • x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go
  • x/inflation/v1/keeper/epoch_info.go
  • x/inflation/v1/keeper/hooks_test.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/ante/evm/mono.go (1)

312-312: LGTM!

The comment change from // nosec: G701 to //nolint:gosec // G115 G701 provides more explicit linter directives to suppress specific security warnings. This change improves the clarity of the code without affecting its functionality.

@GAtom22
Copy link
Contributor Author

GAtom22 commented Sep 9, 2024

https://github.com/Mergifyio backport rama/release-v20

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 9, 2024

backport rama/release-v20

✅ Backports have been created

@0xstepit 0xstepit merged commit 0822b8f into main Sep 10, 2024
48 of 51 checks passed
@0xstepit 0xstepit deleted the fix-lint branch September 10, 2024 09:44
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
* fix linter

* run make format

---------

Co-authored-by: GAtom22 <GAtom22@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: stepit <48993133+0xstepit@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0822b8f)
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2024
9 tasks
0xstepit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
fix linter (#2839)

* fix linter

* run make format

---------

Co-authored-by: GAtom22 <GAtom22@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: stepit <48993133+0xstepit@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0822b8f)

Co-authored-by: Tom <54514587+GAtom22@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants