Skip to content

Conversation

luchenqun
Copy link
Contributor

@luchenqun luchenqun commented Sep 9, 2024

Description

Eliminate a TODO, hahaha. more details see: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/d71831255da7ecb3817c9e14c9142fe9d4441d3b/eth/gasestimator/gasestimator.go#L73-L105

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced gas limit estimation based on account's available balance, improving transaction capability clarity for users.
  • Documentation

    • Updated CHANGELOG.md to reflect recent changes regarding gas limit calculations associated with account balances.
  • Tests

    • Added new test cases to validate transaction failures due to insufficient balance when accounting for gas fees.

@luchenqun luchenqun requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2024 15:14
@luchenqun luchenqun requested review from hanchon and 0xstepit and removed request for a team September 9, 2024 15:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) functionality by updating the gas estimation logic in the EstimateGasInternal function. This update allows the highest gas limit to be determined based on the account's available balance, ensuring more accurate gas calculations for transactions. Additionally, new test cases are introduced to validate scenarios of insufficient balance for gas fees, and a new entry is added to the CHANGELOG.md to document these updates, preserving the overall structure of the changelog.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added entry for pull request #2836 documenting the recap of the highest gas limit with account's balance.
x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go Modified EstimateGasInternal to incorporate logic for assessing the highest gas limit based on account balance.
x/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.go Added two test cases in TestEstimateGas to validate insufficient balance scenarios for gas fees.

Poem

In the meadow where the bunnies play,
Gas limits now dance in a clearer way.
With balances checked, oh what a sight,
Transactions glide, all feeling just right!
Hops of joy for code that's refined,
A happy EVM, with balance aligned! 🐇✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78ce37b and 9fcf859.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec4861c and ef9ab52.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.65%. Comparing base (f097735) to head (9fcf859).
Report is 305 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2836       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   70.45%   22.65%   -47.80%     
===========================================
  Files         293      413      +120     
  Lines       22559    73260    +50701     
===========================================
+ Hits        15893    16596      +703     
- Misses       5800    54923    +49123     
- Partials      866     1741      +875     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go 86.75% <100.00%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

... and 400 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@0xstepit 0xstepit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this! I added a couple of tests to check the failing scenarios of the code you added. Do you mind sync this branch with yours?

https://github.com/evmos/evmos/tree/luke/imp-estimate-gas

@luchenqun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for adding this! I added a couple of tests to check the failing scenarios of the code you added. Do you mind sync this branch with yours?

https://github.com/evmos/evmos/tree/luke/imp-estimate-gas

Thank you @0xstepit for completing the unit test for me. Perfect!

Signed-off-by: Luke <luchenqun@qq.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@0xstepit 0xstepit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again @luchenqun !

Copy link
Contributor

@GAtom22 GAtom22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! thanks for the contribution @luchenqun!
Left one nit comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants