Skip to content

Conversation

0xstepit
Copy link
Contributor

@0xstepit 0xstepit commented Sep 23, 2024

Changes

  • Add a x/bank wrapper in the x/evm keeper to account for coins with different decimals representation.
  • Update evm coin getter function.
  • Update the test suite to register accounts only if it is nil.
  • Add SetEVMCoinTEST to set the evm coin when the App is not built.
  • Made EvmCoinInfo fields public. The validation of fields happen during the change of the global var so it is safe.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced BankWrapper to manage EVM coin denominations with varying decimal representations.
    • Added utility functions for converting coin amounts to and from 18 decimal places.
    • Updated the changelog to reflect recent modifications.
    • Added a new README.md for the wrappers package detailing functionality and conversion logic.
  • Improvements

    • Updated denomination retrieval across multiple components to use GetEVMCoinDenom(), ensuring consistency in EVM-related transactions.
    • Enhanced balance management processes by centralizing through BankWrapper.
    • Streamlined gas fee refunds and balance management using the new BankWrapper.
    • Expanded documentation for gRPC methods to clarify functionality and decimal representation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted logic in several functions to correctly handle fees and balances using the new BankWrapper.
    • Fixed validator address errors in the evmosd testnet init-files command.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve transitioning from BankKeeper to BankWrapper for managing EVM coins within the codebase. This includes updates across various files where the method of retrieving coin denominations has been refined to utilize GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of the more generic GetDenom(). The modifications enhance the handling of currency representation and management specifically for Ethereum-based transactions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added an entry indicating the replacement of BankKeeper with BankWrapper for managing EVM coins with different decimal configurations.
app/ante/evm/utils_test.go, rpc/backend/call_tx.go, x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go Updated variable assignments from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in various functions, indicating a shift to EVM-specific denominations.
x/evm/wrappers/README.md Introduced a new README.md file outlining the BankWrapper functionality and its role in managing EVM coins with custom decimal representations.
x/evm/types/interfaces.go, x/evm/wrappers/bank.go, x/evm/wrappers/utils.go Added BankWrapper interface and its implementation to manage EVM coins, including utility functions for converting between different decimal representations.
x/evm/keeper/statedb.go Updated the SetBalance method to use bankWrapper instead of bankKeeper, modifying balance management operations for EVM coins.
app/ante/evm/setup_test.go Commented out a block of code related to legacy EIP-712 encodings, disabling the related test case due to incompatibility with current TypedData encodings.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • GAtom22
  • hanchon

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
We’ve swapped BankKeeper for a brighter day.
With BankWrapper now in the lead,
EVM coins will surely succeed!
Hopping through tests, all clear and bright,
Our transactions will now take flight! 🌟

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Error running LanguageTool: LanguageTool error: Unknown error


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@0xstepit 0xstepit marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 15:48
@0xstepit 0xstepit requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2024 15:48
@0xstepit 0xstepit requested review from hanchon and GAtom22 and removed request for a team September 23, 2024 15:48
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
x/evm/wrappers/README.md (1)

6-8: Consider expanding the Bank section

While the Bank section introduces the concept of a wrapper interface, it could benefit from additional details. Consider adding:

  1. A brief description of the Bank wrapper's specific purpose.
  2. An overview of the key functionalities provided by the wrapper interface.
  3. Any important considerations or usage notes for developers.

Expanding this section would provide more valuable information for developers working with the Bank wrapper.

x/evm/wrappers/utils.go (2)

30-70: Address commented-out code

There are several commented-out functions in this file. While they might be useful for future reference, it's generally not recommended to keep unused code in the codebase. Consider the following actions:

  1. If these functions are no longer needed, remove them entirely.
  2. If they might be useful in the future, move them to a separate document or create a GitHub issue to track their potential implementation.
  3. If the validateReceivedCoin function is still relevant, consider implementing it and using it in the active functions.

Here's a suggestion for handling the validateReceivedCoin function if it's still needed:

func validateReceivedCoin(coin sdk.Coin) error {
    evmCoinDenom := config.GetEVMCoinDenom()

    if evmCoinDenom != coin.Denom {
        return fmt.Errorf("expected EVM coin denom %s but received %s", evmCoinDenom, coin.Denom)
    }

    return nil
}

You can then use this function in convertTo18DecimalsCoin and convertFrom18DecimalsCoin for input validation.


1-70: Summary: Implementation aligns with PR objectives, with room for improvements

The new utils.go file in the x/evm/wrappers package successfully introduces functionality for converting coin amounts between different decimal representations, which aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM environment.

Key points:

  1. The main functions convertTo18DecimalsCoin and convertFrom18DecimalsCoin provide the core functionality needed.
  2. The implementation could be enhanced with better error handling, input validation, and immutability considerations.
  3. The commented-out code should be addressed, either by removing it or implementing relevant parts.

These utility functions will contribute to more accurate and flexible coin management within the EVM environment, as intended. However, I recommend addressing the suggested improvements before merging this PR to ensure robustness and maintainability of the code.

To further align with the PR objectives and enhance the overall architecture:

  1. Consider adding unit tests for these utility functions to ensure their correctness and prevent regressions.
  2. Document the expected behavior for edge cases (e.g., very large amounts, precision loss) in the function comments.
  3. If these utility functions are meant to be used across different parts of the codebase, consider creating a more generic package for such utilities, which could be easily imported and used by other modules.
x/evm/config/denom_config.go (1)

33-34: LGTM: Informative comment for evmCoinInfo

The new comment for evmCoinInfo provides valuable information about its purpose and usage limitations. This addition enhances code understanding and helps prevent misuse.

Consider adding a brief explanation of why this variable can only be set before starting the app, to provide more context for developers.

tests/e2e/tx_test.go (1)

28-28: LGTM! Consider adding a clarifying comment.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns well with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM context. This ensures that the e2e test uses the correct denomination for EVM operations.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining why GetEVMCoinDenom() is used instead of GetDenom(). This would help future developers understand the distinction between the two methods. For example:

+ // Use GetEVMCoinDenom() to ensure correct decimal representation for EVM operations
sentCoins := sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(config.GetEVMCoinDenom(), 10000000000)}
app/ante/evm/eth_benchmark_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-95: Consider expanding test coverage and updating documentation

While the change is minimal, it represents a shift in how the EVM coin denomination is retrieved. To ensure comprehensive coverage and maintain consistency, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Review other test files and update any occurrences of config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() where appropriate.
  2. Add test cases to this benchmark that explicitly test scenarios with different coin denominations and decimal places to ensure the new GetEVMCoinDenom() function handles all cases correctly.
  3. Update any relevant documentation to reflect this change in denomination handling, especially if it affects how developers should interact with the EVM module.

These changes will help ensure that the new coin decimal conversion functionality is thoroughly tested and well-documented, improving the overall robustness of the EVM module.

x/evm/keeper/gas.go (1)

Line range hint 1-86: Overall assessment: The change is focused and aligns with PR objectives.

The modification to use bankWrapper instead of bankKeeper in the RefundGas function is the only change in this file. It's a targeted alteration that supports the PR's goal of introducing a bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion.

Given the limited scope of the change, the risk of unintended side effects is minimal. However, it's crucial to ensure that the bankWrapper implementation correctly handles all scenarios, particularly when dealing with coins of different decimal places.

Consider documenting the purpose and behavior of the bankWrapper, especially its handling of coin decimal conversions, in the package or function comments. This will help future developers understand the rationale behind this architectural change.

x/evm/types/interfaces.go (4)

70-85: LGTM! Consider a minor documentation improvement.

The new BankWrapper interface is well-designed and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It extends the BankKeeper interface and adds two new methods for handling coin decimal conversion, which is crucial for accurate EVM coin management.

Consider adding a brief note in the interface documentation about why this wrapper is necessary. For example:

 // BankWrapper defines the methods required by the wrapper around
 // the Cosmos SDK x/bank keeper that is used to manage an EVM coin
-// with a configurable value for decimals.
+// with a configurable value for decimals. This wrapper is necessary
+// to handle the potential mismatch between EVM's standard 18 decimal
+// places and the actual decimals used by the coin in the Cosmos ecosystem.

This addition would provide more context about the purpose of this wrapper to future developers.


77-80: LGTM! Consider adding error details.

The MintCoinsToAccount method is well-defined and documented. It clearly outlines its purpose of scaling down coins from 18 decimals and minting them to the specified account.

Consider updating the method signature to provide more detailed error information:

-MintCoinsToAccount(ctx context.Context, recipientAddr sdk.AccAddress, amt sdk.Coins) error
+MintCoinsToAccount(ctx context.Context, recipientAddr sdk.AccAddress, amt sdk.Coins) (sdk.Coins, error)

This change would allow the method to return the actual amount of coins minted after scaling, providing more transparency in the minting process.


81-84: LGTM! Consider adding error details.

The BurnAccountCoins method is well-defined and documented. It clearly outlines its purpose of scaling down coins from 18 decimals and burning them from the specified account.

Consider updating the method signature to provide more detailed error information:

-BurnAccountCoins(ctx context.Context, account sdk.AccAddress, amt sdk.Coins) error
+BurnAccountCoins(ctx context.Context, account sdk.AccAddress, amt sdk.Coins) (sdk.Coins, error)

This change would allow the method to return the actual amount of coins burned after scaling, providing more transparency in the burning process.


70-85: Overall, excellent addition to enhance EVM coin management!

The new BankWrapper interface is a well-designed solution to handle the decimal conversion between EVM's standard 18 decimals and the actual decimals used in the Cosmos ecosystem. This addition aligns perfectly with the PR objectives and will significantly improve the accuracy and flexibility of coin management within the EVM environment.

The interface and its methods are well-documented and follow good coding practices. The suggested minor improvements in documentation and error handling will further enhance the usability and transparency of these new methods.

To ensure the effectiveness of this new wrapper, consider the following:

  1. Implement comprehensive unit tests for the BankWrapper methods, covering various scenarios of decimal conversion.
  2. Update any existing code that interacts with BankKeeper for EVM-related operations to use BankWrapper instead.
  3. Document the usage of BankWrapper in the module's README or developer documentation to guide other developers on when and how to use this new interface.
x/evm/keeper/fees.go (1)

58-61: Approved: Coin decimal conversion implemented as intended

The changes effectively implement the bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. The use of k.bankWrapper instead of k.bankKeeper ensures that fees are properly converted from the 18-decimal representation to the original format before interacting with the bank keeper.

Consider slightly rewording the comment for improved clarity:

- // deduct the full gas cost from the user balance. Notice that it is used
- // the bankWrapper to properly convert fees from the 18 decimals
- // representation to the original one before calling into the bank keeper.
+ // Deduct the full gas cost from the user balance. The bankWrapper is used
+ // to properly convert fees from the 18-decimal representation to the original
+ // format before interacting with the bank keeper.
precompiles/vesting/tx.go (2)

Line range hint 194-198: LGTM. Consider refactoring for improved maintainability.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistent with the previous modification and aligns with the PR objective. This ensures that the clawback amount is calculated using the correct EVM-compatible coin denomination.

To improve code maintainability and reduce duplication, consider extracting the EVM coin denomination retrieval into a separate function within this package. This would centralize the logic and make future updates easier. For example:

func getEVMCoinDenom() string {
    return config.GetEVMCoinDenom()
}

Then, update both occurrences to use this new function:

-clawbackAmt := response.Coins.AmountOf(config.GetEVMCoinDenom()).BigInt()
+clawbackAmt := response.Coins.AmountOf(getEVMCoinDenom()).BigInt()

This refactoring would make it easier to modify the denomination retrieval logic in the future if needed.


Line range hint 1-300: Summary: EVM coin denomination handling improved

The changes in this file consistently update the coin denomination handling to use config.GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of config.GetDenom(). This aligns well with the PR objective of introducing a x/bank wrapper within the x/evm keeper to handle coins with different decimal representations.

These modifications enhance the EVM compatibility of the vesting operations, specifically in the FundVestingAccount and Clawback functions. The changes appear to be part of a broader effort to improve EVM support in the codebase.

To ensure the completeness of this update:

  1. Verify that all relevant functions in the vesting package that deal with coin denominations have been updated to use GetEVMCoinDenom().
  2. Consider adding unit tests specifically for these EVM-related changes to ensure correct behavior with different coin decimal representations.
  3. Update any relevant documentation to reflect these changes in EVM coin handling.
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the completeness of the EVM coin denomination update
echo "Searching for remaining GetDenom() usage in the vesting package:"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)' ./x/vesting
echo "Searching for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage in the vesting package:"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' ./x/vesting
rpc/backend/node_info.go (1)

Line range hint 1-346: Summary of changes and potential impact

The modifications in this file consistently replace evmconfig.GetDenom() with evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom(). These changes align with the PR objective of improving coin decimal handling for EVM operations. The updates affect the GenerateMinGasCoin and RPCMinGasPrice functions, which could impact gas price calculations and minimum gas price determination.

While the changes appear appropriate, it's crucial to verify that they don't have unintended consequences on gas price calculations, existing tests, and related documentation. The suggested verification steps in the previous comments should help ensure the changes are implemented correctly and consistently throughout the codebase.

Consider adding or updating unit tests specifically for these functions to validate the behavior with the new GetEVMCoinDenom() function. Also, ensure that any relevant documentation or configuration guides are updated to reflect these changes in denomination handling.

x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (3)

48-52: LGTM: Introduction of bankWrapper

The replacement of bankKeeper with bankWrapper aligns with the PR objective. The added comment clearly explains the purpose of the wrapper.

Consider slightly rewording the comment for clarity:

- // bankWrapper is used to convert the Cosmos SDK coin used in the EVM to the
- // proper decimal representation.
+ // bankWrapper is used to convert Cosmos SDK coins to the proper decimal
+ // representation for use in the EVM.

290-299: LGTM: Updated GetBalance method to use bankWrapper

The changes to the GetBalance method correctly implement the use of the new bankWrapper for retrieving the balance with proper decimal conversion. The use of config.GetEVMCoinDenom() ensures the correct denomination is used.

Consider renaming the coin variable to balance for clarity:

- coin := k.bankWrapper.GetBalance(ctx, cosmosAddr, evmDenom)
+ balance := k.bankWrapper.GetBalance(ctx, cosmosAddr, evmDenom)

- return coin.Amount.BigInt()
+ return balance.Amount.BigInt()

315-315: Consider creating an issue for the TODO comment

The TODO comment suggests using the wrapper in the getBaseFee method. While this is not directly related to the current PR's objective, it's a good practice to track such tasks.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the task of updating the getBaseFee method to use the new wrapper?

rpc/backend/call_tx.go (1)

Line range hint 1-524: Consider broader impact analysis

While the change is isolated to the SendRawTransaction function, it's important to consider its potential impact on other parts of the system.

Please consider the following:

  1. Does this change affect how transactions are processed in other functions?
  2. Are there any other places in the codebase where GetDenom() is used that might need to be updated to GetEVMCoinDenom()?
  3. Does this change require updates to any tests or documentation?
  4. Are there any performance implications of using GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of GetDenom()?

To assist with this analysis, you may want to run the following command to find other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated:

rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)" --files-with-matches

This will help identify other files that might need similar updates.

x/evm/keeper/fees_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-562: Summary of changes and recommendations

The modification in this file aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() ensures that the EVM-specific coin denomination is used for fee calculations in the tests.

To ensure the consistency and correctness of this change:

  1. Verify that all tests in this file and related EVM modules pass with the new configuration.
  2. Check if similar changes are needed in other parts of the codebase where config.GetDenom() is used in an EVM context.
  3. Update any relevant documentation to reflect this change in denomination handling for EVM-related operations.

These steps will help maintain consistency across the codebase and prevent potential issues related to denomination mismatches.

precompiles/staking/tx.go (1)

Line range hint 237-244: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The added code correctly handles the balance update in the EVM state DB for delegations made through contract calls using the EVM coin denomination. This change improves consistency between the Cosmos SDK bank keeper and the EVM state DB, preventing potential overwriting issues during state commitment.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this block, e.g.:

+	// Update EVM state DB for delegations made through contract calls using EVM coin denomination
 	if !isCallerOrigin && msg.Amount.Denom == config.GetEVMCoinDenom() {
 		// get the delegator address from the message
 		delAccAddr := sdk.MustAccAddressFromBech32(msg.DelegatorAddress)
 		delHexAddr := common.BytesToAddress(delAccAddr)
 		// NOTE: This ensures that the changes in the bank keeper are correctly mirrored to the EVM stateDB
 		// when calling the precompile from a smart contract
 		// This prevents the stateDB from overwriting the changed balance in the bank keeper when committing the EVM state.
 		p.SetBalanceChangeEntries(cmn.NewBalanceChangeEntry(delHexAddr, msg.Amount.Amount.BigInt(), cmn.Sub))
 	}
x/evm/types/msg_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-1005: Consider adding tests for EVM coin denomination functionality

While the existing test suite is comprehensive, it might be beneficial to add specific test cases that verify the correct handling of EVM coin denominations. This could include:

  1. Testing that GetEVMCoinDenom() returns the expected value.
  2. Verifying that transactions using the EVM coin denomination are processed correctly.
  3. Ensuring compatibility between the general coin denomination and the EVM-specific denomination.

These additional tests would help ensure the robustness of the new bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion.

app/ante/evm/ante_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-1024: Summary of changes in ante_test.go

The main change in this file is the replacement of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() on line 65. While this change appears minor, it could have implications on how denominations are handled in the test suite.

Consider the following points:

  1. Ensure that this change aligns with the PR objective of introducing a "bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion".
  2. Verify that all relevant tests in this file and other related files are updated to use the correct denomination retrieval method.
  3. Document the reason for this change in a comment, explaining why GetEVMCoinDenom() is now preferred over GetDenom().
  4. Review the config package to ensure that GetEVMCoinDenom() is properly implemented and returns the expected value.

These steps will help maintain consistency across the codebase and prevent potential issues related to denomination handling in the future.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

62-62: LGTM! Consider minor rewording.

The changelog entry accurately reflects the changes made in the PR. It's great to see this significant improvement documented.

Consider rewording slightly for clarity:

- (evm) [#2872](https://github.com/evmos/evmos/pull/2873) Change `BankKeeper` for `BankWrapper` to manage EVM coin with different decimals.
+ (evm) [#2872](https://github.com/evmos/evmos/pull/2873) Replace `BankKeeper` with `BankWrapper` to manage EVM coins with different decimal configurations.

This minor change emphasizes the replacement aspect and clarifies that it affects multiple coins.

Tools
Markdownlint

62-62: Expected: 120; Actual: 139
Line length

(MD013, line-length)

x/evm/wrappers/bank.go (2)

18-18: Correct the grammatical error in the comment.

The comment on line 18 has a grammatical error that could cause confusion. It should be rephrased for clarity.

Apply this diff to fix the comment:

-// that is used to manage an evm denom a custom decimal representation.
+// that is used to manage an EVM denomination with a custom decimal representation.

37-38: Address the TODO regarding denom parameter handling.

The TODO comment suggests uncertainty about allowing a denom parameter when the wrapper is intended to handle only the EVM denomination. Consider whether the denom parameter is necessary. If not, refactor the code to remove it or enforce handling only the EVM denom.

Would you like assistance in refactoring the GetBalance method to remove the denom parameter or to ensure it handles only the EVM denomination? I can help implement these changes or open a GitHub issue to track this task.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f382725 and abe68fb.

Files selected for processing (48)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/cosmos/authz_test.go (2 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/08_vesting.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/ante_test.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/eth_benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/fee_checker.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/fee_checker_test.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/fee_market_test.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/mono.go (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
  • ethereum/eip712/eip712_test.go (1 hunks)
  • ethereum/eip712/preprocess_test.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/distribution/tx.go (4 hunks)
  • precompiles/erc20/tx.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/ics20/tx.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/staking/tx.go (1 hunks)
  • precompiles/vesting/tx.go (2 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/call_tx.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/call_tx_test.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/node_info.go (2 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/node_info_test.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/sign_tx.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/sign_tx_test.go (1 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/tracing_test.go (1 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
  • testutil/tx/eth.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/client/cli/tx.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/config/chain_config.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/config/denom_config.go (4 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/call_evm.go (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/fees.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/fees_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/gas.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go (3 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (4 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (6 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/setup_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/state_transition.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/statedb.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/types/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/types/msg_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/wrappers/README.md (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/wrappers/bank.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/wrappers/utils.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • x/evm/keeper/call_evm.go
Additional context used
Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md

62-62: Expected: 120; Actual: 139
Line length

(MD013, line-length)

Additional comments not posted (63)
x/evm/wrappers/README.md (1)

1-4: LGTM: Clear and concise introduction

The introduction effectively explains the purpose of the wrappers package, aligning well with the PR objectives. It provides valuable context for developers working with the x/evm module.

x/evm/keeper/abci.go (1)

12-12: Verify the accuracy of the updated comment

The updated comment is more focused on the main action of the function, which is setting the EIP155 chain ID. However, it might be beneficial to slightly modify the comment to provide more context.

Let's verify the implementation of WithChainID to ensure it sets the EIP155 chain ID as the comment suggests:

Consider modifying the comment slightly for clarity:

-// BeginBlock sets the EIP155 chain id to the Keeper.
+// BeginBlock sets the EIP155 chain ID in the Keeper using the provided SDK context.

This modification maintains the focus on setting the EIP155 chain ID while also acknowledging the use of the SDK context.

Verification successful

Verified the updated comment is accurate.

The WithChainID method properly sets the EIP155 chain ID in the Keeper as described.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of WithChainID method

# Search for the WithChainID method definition
echo "Searching for WithChainID method:"
rg --type go -A 10 'func \(.*\) WithChainID\('

# Search for EIP155 chain ID usage within the method
echo "Searching for EIP155 chain ID usage:"
rg --type go -A 5 'EIP155'

Length of output: 41015

x/evm/config/chain_config.go (1)

17-18: LGTM! Consider verifying constant usage.

The relocation of the testChainID constant and the addition of a descriptive comment improve code organization and documentation. This change doesn't affect the functionality of the DefaultChainConfig function.

To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following script to verify the usage of testChainID across the codebase:

Verification successful

Verified: testChainID usage is confined to chain_config.go

The testChainID constant is only used within x/evm/config/chain_config.go, and no other files import the config package containing it. This relocation does not affect other parts of the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of testChainID constant across the codebase

# Test: Search for testChainID usage
echo "Searching for testChainID usage:"
rg --type go 'testChainID'

# Test: Check if testChainID is imported in other files
echo "Checking if testChainID is imported in other files:"
rg --type go 'import.*"github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/config"'

Length of output: 505

x/evm/wrappers/utils.go (1)

1-10: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.

The package name, imports, and copyright notice are all in order and align with the file's purpose.

x/evm/config/denom_config.go (3)

15-16: LGTM: Improved type documentation

The updated comment for the Decimals type provides a clear and accurate description of its purpose and implementation. This enhancement improves code readability and understanding.


20-22: LGTM: Enhanced constant documentation

The updated comments for SixDecimals and EighteenDecimals constants provide more specific information about their usage. This improvement enhances code readability and maintains consistency with the overall documentation style.


61-62: LGTM: New getter function for EVM coin denom

The addition of GetEVMCoinDenom() function complements the existing GetEVMCoinDecimals() function, providing a complete API for retrieving EVM coin information. The function name and comment are clear and descriptive, enhancing the overall usability of the package.

x/evm/client/cli/tx.go (1)

63-63: LGTM! Verify impact on other parts of the codebase.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns well with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations. This modification ensures that the correct denomination is used when building transactions in the EVM context.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated:

This will help identify any other places where similar changes might be necessary to maintain consistency with this new approach.

Verification successful

Verified the replacement of GetDenom() with GetEVMCoinDenom() in EVM CLI transaction code.

The change is appropriately localized to EVM-related components, ensuring that transactions within the EVM context use the correct denomination. No unintended impacts on other parts of the codebase were identified based on the search results.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need updating

# Search for GetDenom() usage
echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage
echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 14261

app/ante/evm/eth_benchmark_test.go (1)

79-79: Ensure consistency with production code

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations. This modification suggests that the EVM now uses a specific denomination for its operations.

To ensure this change is consistent with the production code and other parts of the system, please run the following checks:

Consider adding a test case that explicitly verifies the correct denomination is used when converting between EVM and Cosmos SDK coin representations. This would help ensure that the change in denomination retrieval doesn't introduce any inconsistencies in coin handling.

Verification successful

Change Verified Successfully

The replacement of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in app/ante/evm/eth_benchmark_test.go is consistent with the EVM-specific context and aligns with the overall handling of denominations within EVM-related modules.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)' -g '!*_test.go'

# Verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() in production code
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' -g '!*_test.go'

# Check for any potential conflicts or inconsistencies
rg --type go '(GetDenom|GetEVMCoinDenom)'

Length of output: 21752

x/evm/keeper/setup_test.go (1)

66-66: Verify consistency of EVM coin denomination change

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns the test setup with an EVM-specific coin denomination. This modification appears to be in line with the PR objective of improving coin decimal handling in the EVM context.

However, to ensure this change doesn't introduce inconsistencies:

  1. Please verify that this new denomination is used consistently across the codebase, especially in other test files and the main EVM keeper implementation.
  2. Consider updating any other tests that might rely on the previous denomination to maintain consistency.
  3. Confirm that this change is intentional and part of the broader strategy for handling EVM-specific coins.

To help verify the consistency of this change, you can run the following script:

This script will help identify any potential inconsistencies in the usage of these methods across the codebase.

Verification successful

EVM Coin Denomination Change Verified

The usage of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom() in the identified files serves distinct purposes:

  • GetDenom() retrieves the network's base denomination.
  • GetEVMCoinDenom() fetches the EVM-specific coin denomination.

The change in x/evm/keeper/setup_test.go to use GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns correctly with its EVM context and maintains consistency across the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for occurrences of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom() in the codebase

echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)"

echo "\nOccurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)"

echo "\nFiles containing both GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go -l "GetDenom\(\)" | xargs rg --type go -l "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)"

Length of output: 14560


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract lines containing GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom() from specific files

files=(
  "app/ante/evm/ante_test.go"
  "app/ante/evm/utils_test.go"
  "x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go"
)

for file in "${files[@]}"; do
  echo "File: $file"
  echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
  rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)" "$file"
  echo ""
  echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
  rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)" "$file"
  echo ""
done

Length of output: 3197


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract lines containing GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom() from specific files for context analysis

files=(
  "app/ante/evm/ante_test.go"
  "app/ante/evm/utils_test.go"
  "x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go"
)

for file in "${files[@]}"; do
  echo "File: $file"
  echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
  rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)" "$file" -C 2
  echo ""
  echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
  rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)" "$file" -C 2
  echo ""
done

Length of output: 6659

precompiles/ics20/tx.go (1)

72-72: Verify the correctness and impact of using GetEVMCoinDenom()

The condition for identifying the EVM coin has been changed from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom(). This modification may alter which tokens are considered as EVM coins, potentially affecting the escrow logic.

  1. Please confirm that GetEVMCoinDenom() is the correct method to use in this context and aligns with the intended behavior for identifying EVM coins.
  2. Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this change to improve code maintainability.
  3. Ensure this change is consistent with other parts of the codebase that may rely on EVM coin denomination identification.

To verify the impact and consistency of this change, please run the following script:

This script will help identify other occurrences of both methods and potential inconsistencies in their usage across the codebase.

Verification successful

Usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistent across the codebase

The replacement of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in precompiles/ics20/tx.go aligns with its consistent usage in other modules such as utility wrappers, bank operations, governance proposals, and testing suites. This ensures that all components correctly identify and handle the EVM coin denomination, maintaining the integrity of the escrow logic and related functionalities.

  • No inconsistencies found: The shell script results show that GetEVMCoinDenom() is uniformly utilized, eliminating concerns about conflicting usages.
  • Recommendation: Consider adding a comment in tx.go to document the reason for this change, enhancing code maintainability and clarity for future developers.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom()
# to ensure consistency across the codebase

echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)' -C 3

echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' -C 3

echo "Checking for potential inconsistencies in EVM coin denomination usage:"
rg --type go '(GetDenom|GetEVMCoinDenom)' -C 3

Length of output: 151623

app/ante/evm/fee_market_test.go (1)

28-28: LGTM! Verify impact on test cases.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion in the EVM context. This modification appropriately focuses on EVM-specific denominations.

To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect test outcomes, please verify:

  1. The behavior of all test cases involving coin operations.
  2. The consistency of this change with the expected behavior in an EVM context.

Run the following script to check for any other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need similar updates:

This will help ensure consistency across the codebase and identify any other potential areas that may need similar updates.

Verification successful

Change Verified: GetEVMCoinDenom() correctly scoped to EVM-related tests.

The replacement of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in app/ante/evm/fee_market_test.go is appropriate and does not affect other test cases outside the EVM context. All other occurrences of GetDenom() in test files remain relevant to their specific contexts and do not require changes.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need updating

# Test: Search for GetDenom() usage in test files
rg --type go -g '*_test.go' 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Test: Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage in test files
rg --type go -g '*_test.go' 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 9674

precompiles/erc20/tx.go (2)

Line range hint 1-144: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives

The modification to use config.GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of config.GetDenom() in the balance change entries is the key change in this file. This alteration supports the PR's goal of improving handling for coins with different decimal representations in the EVM environment. The change is minimal but impactful, focusing specifically on EVM coin denominations.

No other parts of the file required changes based on this modification. The overall structure and logic of the file remain intact and consistent with the new approach.


112-114: LGTM! Verify impact on balance tracking.

The change to use config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations. This ensures that balance changes are only recorded for EVM coin denominations, which is a more precise approach.

To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following verification:

Verification successful

Verified: Scope of Change is Appropriate.

The update to use config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in precompiles/erc20/tx.go is correctly scoped to handle EVM-compatible coin denominations. Other occurrences of GetDenom() in different modules remain unaffected, ensuring that their respective functionalities are preserved.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated to GetEVMCoinDenom()

# Test: Search for GetDenom() usage in the codebase
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Test: Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage in the codebase
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

# Compare the results to ensure all relevant occurrences have been updated

Length of output: 14121

testutil/tx/eth.go (2)

42-42: LGTM! Verify impact on fee calculation and tests.

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() appears to be more specific and appropriate for EVM transactions. This aligns well with the function's purpose.

Please ensure that:

  1. This change doesn't negatively impact fee calculations later in the function.
  2. Any test cases relying on PrepareEthTx are updated if necessary.

Run the following script to check for potential impacts:


Line range hint 1-191: Verify consistency with PR objectives

The change aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. However, it's important to ensure that this change in the test utility fully supports the broader goal of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM environment.

Please confirm:

  1. Does this change in the test utility adequately support testing scenarios involving coins with different decimal representations?
  2. Are there any other test files or utilities that might need similar updates to fully cover the new functionality?

Run the following script to check for other potential areas that might need updates:

app/ante/evm/fee_checker.go (2)

Line range hint 1-173: Overall assessment: LGTM with suggestions for verification

The change in the feeChecker function appears to be consistent with the PR objectives and improves the specificity of denomination retrieval for EVM transactions. The rest of the file remains unchanged and seems consistent with this modification.

To ensure the robustness of this change, please:

  1. Verify the impact on other parts of the codebase that might use GetDenom().
  2. Confirm the compatibility of the new denom value with its usages in the feeChecker function.
  3. Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of GetDenom() to improve code clarity.

Line range hint 49-110: Verify compatibility of new denom value

The change in the denom retrieval method might affect fee calculations and validations throughout the feeChecker function. Please ensure that the value returned by config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is compatible with all usages of denom in the function, particularly in the following areas:

  1. Fee amount calculation (line 54)
  2. Error message formatting (line 72)
  3. Effective fee calculation (lines 82-86)

To verify the compatibility, please run the following script to check the structure and values of both GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom():

Review the results to ensure that both methods return compatible values for use in fee calculations and error messages.

Verification successful

Denomination Compatibility Verified

The GetEVMCoinDenom() function retrieves the denomination from evmCoinInfo.denom, which is consistently assigned via the configuration in configurator.go. There are no detected conflicts or inconsistencies in its usage across the feeChecker function and the broader codebase. This ensures that fee calculations and related validations remain reliable with the updated denomination retrieval method.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the structure and values of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom()

# Search for the implementation of GetDenom()
echo "Implementation of GetDenom():"
rg --type go -A 5 'func.*GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for the implementation of GetEVMCoinDenom()
echo "Implementation of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go -A 5 'func.*GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 3934


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the definition and initialization of evmCoinInfo and search for other usages of GetEVMCoinDenom()

# Search for the definition and initialization of evmCoinInfo
echo "Definition and initialization of evmCoinInfo:"
rg --type go -A 10 'var evmCoinInfo'

# Search for other usages of GetEVMCoinDenom()
echo "Other usages of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 5566


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all assignments to evmCoinInfo.denom and usages of setEVMCoinInfo()

# Search for assignments to evmCoinInfo.denom
echo "Assignments to evmCoinInfo.denom:"
rg --type go 'evmCoinInfo\.denom\s*='

# Search for usages of setEVMCoinInfo()
echo "Usages of setEVMCoinInfo():"
rg --type go 'setEVMCoinInfo\('

Length of output: 403


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the definition and assignments of ec.evmDenom to verify its value and source.

# Search for the definition of ec.evmDenom
echo "Definition of ec.evmDenom:"
rg --type go 'ec\.evmDenom'

# Search for all assignments to ec.evmDenom
echo "Assignments to ec.evmDenom:"
rg --type go 'ec\.evmDenom\s*='

# Search for validations or constraints on ec.evmDenom
echo "Validations or constraints on ec.evmDenom:"
rg --type go 'ec\.evmDenom.*(validate|check|ensure)'

Length of output: 654

rpc/backend/sign_tx.go (1)

71-71: LGTM! Verify impact on transaction building and update documentation.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM context. This is a good improvement for more accurate and flexible coin management.

To ensure the change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior:

  1. Verify that BuildTx method correctly handles the new baseDenom value.
  2. Check if this change affects any existing transaction validation logic.

Run the following script to verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom():

Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments to reflect this change in denomination handling.

Verification successful

Verified: Change correctly implemented.

The replacement of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in rpc/backend/sign_tx.go is consistent with its usage across the codebase for EVM-specific denominations. The BuildTx method appropriately handles the new baseDenom, and no conflicts or issues are detected from existing usages of GetDenom() in other contexts.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() and its impact

# Test: Search for other occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom()
echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)"

# Test: Check for any GetDenom() calls that might need to be updated
echo "Remaining occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)"

# Test: Look for BuildTx method to ensure it can handle the new baseDenom
echo "BuildTx method implementation:"
rg --type go -A 10 "BuildTx\("

Length of output: 22784

rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go (1)

186-186: LGTM. Verify consistency across codebase.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. This update likely provides a more appropriate denomination for EVM transactions in the test suite.

To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated:

Please review the results and consider if any other occurrences of GetDenom() should be updated to GetEVMCoinDenom() for consistency. Additionally, ensure that related tests are updated if necessary to reflect this change in denomination handling.

Verification successful

Consistency Verified Successfully

The update from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go is appropriately scoped to EVM-related contexts. All other occurrences of GetDenom() remain contextually relevant and do not require changes.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need updating

# Search for GetDenom() usage in test files
echo "Occurrences of GetDenom() in test files:"
rg --type go -g '*_test.go' 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for GetDenom() usage in non-test files
echo "Occurrences of GetDenom() in non-test files:"
rg --type go -g '!*_test.go' 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage
echo "Current usage of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 14453

app/ante/evm/fee_checker_test.go (1)

57-57: LGTM! Verify impact on test cases.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion in the EVM context. This modification ensures that the test cases use the EVM-specific coin denomination, which is more appropriate for testing EVM-related functionality.

To ensure this change doesn't unexpectedly alter test outcomes, please run the following verification:

rpc/backend/tracing_test.go (1)

40-40: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion in the EVM context. This modification ensures that the test cases use the correct denomination for EVM transactions.

To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated:

Please review the results to ensure that all relevant occurrences have been updated consistently.

app/ante/evm/mono.go (1)

90-90: LGTM, but verify impact and update documentation if needed.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() appears to align with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM context. This more specific denomination retrieval could improve accuracy in EVM-related operations.

However, please ensure the following:

  1. Verify that this change doesn't negatively impact other parts of the system that may rely on the previous denomination.
  2. Update any relevant documentation or comments that may reference the denomination used in this context.
  3. Consider adding a comment explaining why the EVM-specific denomination is used here, to improve code maintainability.

To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:

This will help identify any other places in the codebase where the denomination is being retrieved, and ensure consistency in usage.

Verification successful

Verified the denomination change does not impact other system parts.

The update from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in app/ante/evm/mono.go is isolated to the EVM module and does not interfere with other modules using GetDenom(). No issues detected.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other usages of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom()

echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'

echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

echo "Checking for potential conflicts or inconsistencies:"
rg --type go 'config\.Get.*Denom\(\)'

Length of output: 19009

x/evm/keeper/statedb.go (3)

116-140: LGTM: Changes align with PR objectives

The modifications to the SetBalance method successfully implement the use of a x/bank wrapper for handling coins with different decimal representations. The overall logic of the method remains intact while introducing the necessary changes to support the new functionality.

Key improvements:

  1. Use of config.GetEVMCoinDenom() for base denomination
  2. Consistent use of bankWrapper for all bank-related operations

These changes should enhance the system's ability to handle different coin decimal representations within the EVM environment.


118-118: Verify the implementation of bankWrapper methods

The replacement of bankKeeper with bankWrapper is consistent with the PR objective of introducing a x/bank wrapper to handle coins with different decimal representations. Please ensure that the following bankWrapper methods are correctly implemented to handle any necessary conversions:

  1. GetBalance
  2. MintCoins
  3. SendCoinsFromModuleToAccount
  4. SendCoinsFromAccountToModule
  5. BurnCoins

These methods should transparently handle any conversion between different decimal representations while maintaining the correct balance calculations.

Also applies to: 125-125, 128-128, 134-134, 137-137


116-116: Verify the implementation of GetEVMCoinDenom()

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations. However, it's crucial to ensure that GetEVMCoinDenom() is correctly implemented to return the appropriate denomination for EVM operations.

rpc/backend/node_info_test.go (1)

73-73: LGTM! Consider verifying similar usages across the codebase.

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion in the EVM context. This update ensures that the test case uses the correct denomination specific to EVM coins.

To ensure consistency, it would be beneficial to verify if similar changes are required in other parts of the codebase. Run the following script to check for other occurrences of GetDenom():

Please review the results to determine if any other instances of GetDenom() should be updated to GetEVMCoinDenom().

precompiles/vesting/tx.go (1)

127-130: LGTM. Verify EVM coin denomination usage.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM context. This modification ensures that the correct EVM-compatible coin denomination is used when calculating the amount for balance change entries.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please verify:

  1. The config.GetEVMCoinDenom() method returns the expected denomination for EVM transactions.
  2. This change is consistent with other parts of the codebase that interact with EVM-related coin operations.
Verification successful

EVM coin denomination usage verified.

The substitution of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in precompiles/vesting/tx.go is consistent with its usage across EVM-related modules. This ensures that EVM-compatible coin denominations are correctly handled without affecting non-EVM parts of the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() in the codebase
echo "Searching for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage:"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' ./
echo "Searching for GetDenom() usage to ensure consistency:"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)' ./

Length of output: 14621

precompiles/distribution/tx.go (5)

174-174: LGTM! Consistent use of EVM coin denomination.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistent with the previous modification and ensures correct handling of EVM coin denominations for delegator rewards.


220-220: LGTM! Consistent application of EVM coin denomination.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() maintains consistency with previous modifications and ensures correct handling of EVM coin denominations for validator commissions.


Line range hint 1-279: Summary: Consistent implementation of EVM coin denomination handling

The changes in this file consistently replace config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() across multiple methods (ClaimRewards, WithdrawDelegatorRewards, WithdrawValidatorCommission, and FundCommunityPool). These modifications align well with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion in the EVM context.

The changes are localized and do not affect the overall logic of the functions. They ensure that the correct EVM coin denomination is used when setting balance change entries for various operations such as claiming rewards, withdrawing delegator rewards, withdrawing validator commissions, and funding the community pool.

These modifications contribute to a more accurate and flexible coin management within the EVM environment, which should improve the system's ability to handle coins with different decimal representations.


261-261: LGTM! Consistent implementation of EVM coin denomination.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() maintains consistency across all modified methods and ensures correct handling of EVM coin denominations for community pool funding.

As a final verification step, let's ensure that all instances of GetDenom() have been updated appropriately in this file:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that no instances of GetDenom() remain in this file
rg --type go 'config\.GetDenom\(\)' precompiles/distribution/tx.go
# Confirm that GetEVMCoinDenom() is used consistently in this file
rg --type go 'config\.GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' precompiles/distribution/tx.go

95-95: LGTM! Verify EVM coin denomination usage.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM context.

To ensure consistency, let's verify that config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is used correctly throughout the codebase:

Verification successful

EVM coin denomination verified successfully.

All instances of config.GetDenom() have been replaced with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() across the codebase, ensuring consistent usage.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of GetDenom() that might need to be updated
rg --type go 'config\.GetDenom\(\)' .
# Search for usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() to ensure it's used consistently
rg --type go 'config\.GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' .

Length of output: 699

rpc/backend/node_info.go (2)

338-338: LGTM. Verify impact on minimum gas price calculations.

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistent with the previous modification and aligns with the PR objective. This update ensures that EVM-specific denominations are used consistently throughout the codebase.

To ensure this change doesn't unexpectedly affect minimum gas price calculations, please run the following verification:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of GetEVMCoinDenom() on minimum gas price calculations

# Test: Check for any tests related to RPCMinGasPrice that might need updating
rg --type go 'TestRPCMinGasPrice'

# Test: Verify if there are any other functions using GetDenom() that might need similar updates
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)' | grep -v 'GetEVMCoinDenom'

# Test: Check for any configuration files or documentation that might need updating due to this change
rg --type yaml 'denom:'
rg --type md 'denom'

284-284: LGTM. Verify impact on gas price calculations.

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of improving coin decimal handling. This modification likely provides a more specific denomination for EVM operations.

To ensure this change doesn't unexpectedly affect gas price calculations, please run the following verification:

Verification successful

LGTM. Verified that GetEVMCoinDenom() is correctly integrated and consistently used across the codebase.

The replacement from GetDenom() to GetEVMCoinDenom() in rpc/backend/node_info.go aligns with the overall codebase standards and leverages the centralized configuration for EVM coin denominations. This change does not introduce any inconsistencies or issues.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of GetEVMCoinDenom() on gas price calculations

# Test: Check for any other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need updating
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Test: Verify the implementation of GetEVMCoinDenom()
rg --type go -A 10 'func GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

# Test: Check for any tests that might need updating due to this change
rg --type go 'TestGenerateMinGasCoin'

Length of output: 11501


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the implementation and usage of GetEVMCoinDenom()

# Check the implementation of GetEVMCoinDenom()
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetEVMCoinDenom\(\) string' rpc/backend/node_info.go

# Check for documentation or comments related to GetEVMCoinDenom()
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom' --context 5

# Verify if GetEVMCoinDenom() is used elsewhere in the codebase
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

# Check for tests related to GetEVMCoinDenom()
rg --type go 'Test.*GetEVMCoinDenom'

# Ensure there are no build or runtime dependencies missing for GetEVMCoinDenom()
rg --type go 'import ' | grep 'evmconfig'

Length of output: 42468

x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (3)

22-22: LGTM: New import for wrappers package

The addition of the import for the wrappers package is correct and necessary for the introduction of the BankWrapper type.


98-99: LGTM: Initialization and assignment of bankWrapper

The initialization of bankWrapper using wrappers.NewBankWrapper(bankKeeper) and its subsequent assignment to the Keeper struct are correct and consistent with the introduced changes.

Also applies to: 105-105


265-265: LGTM: Added comment for GetAccountOrEmpty method

The added comment clearly explains the purpose of the GetAccountOrEmpty method, improving code readability and understanding.

app/ante/cosmos/authz_test.go (3)

321-321: LGTM. Consistent use of EVM coin denomination.

This change is consistent with the previous update in the TestAuthzLimiterDecorator function. It ensures that the TestRejectMsgsInAuthz function also uses the EVM-specific coin denomination.


51-51: Verify test coverage after EVM coin denomination changes.

The consistent update to use config.GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of config.GetDenom() across the test suite aligns well with the PR objective of handling different coin denominations. This change standardizes the use of EVM-specific coin denominations in the tests.

To ensure these changes haven't inadvertently affected the test coverage, please run the test suite with coverage analysis and compare it to the previous results:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Run tests with coverage and compare to previous results

# Run tests with coverage
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

# Generate coverage report
go tool cover -func=coverage.out > coverage_report.txt

# Compare with previous coverage report (assuming it exists)
if [ -f previous_coverage_report.txt ]; then
    diff previous_coverage_report.txt coverage_report.txt
else
    echo "No previous coverage report found. Please save this report for future comparison."
fi

# Display current coverage report
cat coverage_report.txt

This will help verify that the test coverage remains consistent after the denomination changes.

Also applies to: 321-321


51-51: LGTM. Verify EVM coin denomination consistency.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling different coin denominations. This update ensures that the tests use the EVM-specific coin denomination.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom():

This will help ensure that the EVM coin denomination is used consistently throughout the project.

Verification successful

Please run the following script to verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() and ensure GetDenom() is not used improperly:


<!-- [monologue]
[task review_file_1/1 review_change_1/2]
Review the results of the shell script that searched for `GetEVMCoinDenom()` and `GetDenom()` usages.

[observations]
- The shell script successfully found multiple occurrences of `GetEVMCoinDenom()` across various files, including the target file `app/ante/cosmos/authz_test.go`.
- In `app/ante/cosmos/authz_test.go`, the change from `GetDenom()` to `GetEVMCoinDenom()` is present, indicating that the replacement was correctly applied.
- Other occurrences of `GetDenom()` are present in different parts of the codebase, predominantly in integration tests and other modules where `GetDenom()` might still be appropriate.
- The presence of `GetDenom()` in other files does not affect the specific change made in `authz_test.go`.

[analysis]
- The replacement of `GetDenom()` with `GetEVMCoinDenom()` in `authz_test.go` aligns with the intended purpose of using an EVM-specific coin denomination.
- The remaining instances of `GetDenom()` in other files are likely intentional and contextually appropriate, indicating that the change in `authz_test.go` does not introduce inconsistencies.
- No unintended usage of `GetDenom()` was found in scenarios where `GetEVMCoinDenom()` should be used, based on the provided search results.

[actions]
- Conclude that the specific change in `authz_test.go` has been correctly implemented.
- Affirm that the presence of `GetDenom()` elsewhere does not compromise the verification of the intended change.
- Mark the verification as successful.
-->

LGTM. GetEVMCoinDenom() is now consistently used in authz_test.go.
The replacement ensures the tests utilize the EVM-specific coin denomination as intended.
Other instances of GetDenom() in the codebase remain appropriate for their respective contexts.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() function across the codebase.

# Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage
echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)"

# Search for GetDenom() usage to ensure it's not used where GetEVMCoinDenom() should be
echo "\nRemaining occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)"

Length of output: 458


Script:

# 
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() and ensure GetDenom() is not used where it should be replaced.

# Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage
echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)" || echo "rg command failed or no occurrences found."

# Search for GetDenom() usage to ensure it's not used where GetEVMCoinDenom() should be
echo "\nOccurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)" || echo "rg command failed or no occurrences found."

Length of output: 14265

rpc/backend/call_tx.go (1)

132-132: Approve change, but verify implications across the codebase

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. This modification likely improves the handling of different decimal representations in the EVM context.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce inconsistencies or break existing functionality, please run the following verification:

This script will help identify any potential conflicts or inconsistencies in the usage of these functions across the codebase.

Verification successful

Change Verified and Approved

The replacement of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in rpc/backend/call_tx.go is consistent with its usage across the codebase. This change appropriately scopes denomination handling to the EVM context without impacting other functionalities that rely on GetDenom().

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom()
# to ensure consistent usage across the codebase.

echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)"

echo "\nOccurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)"

echo "\nChecking for potential conflicts or inconsistencies:"
rg --type go "(GetDenom|GetEVMCoinDenom)"

Length of output: 31561

rpc/backend/call_tx_test.go (3)

Line range hint 1-489: Summary of changes and recommendations

The change in this file is minimal but significant, aligning with the PR objective of introducing a bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion. Here's a summary of the review:

  1. The modification from GetDenom() to GetEVMCoinDenom() is appropriate for the context of EVM transactions.
  2. The change is isolated to the TestSendRawTransaction function, which is correct if this is the only test affected by the new EVM coin denomination handling.

Recommendations:

  1. Ensure that similar changes have been made in the main implementation code, not just in tests.
  2. Review and update documentation related to denomination handling in EVM contexts.
  3. Consider adding new test cases that specifically target the new EVM coin denomination functionality.
  4. Verify that this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes for existing integrations or APIs.

To get a broader view of the changes related to this PR, please run:

This will help ensure that all necessary changes have been made consistently across the codebase.


295-297: Consider broader implications of EVM coin denomination change

The modification to use GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of GetDenom() in the TestSendRawTransaction function may have broader implications:

  1. Ensure that this change accurately reflects the intended behavior for processing EVM transactions in the main codebase.
  2. Verify that the test still covers all necessary scenarios, including edge cases that might be affected by the specific EVM coin denomination.
  3. Consider adding additional test cases to explicitly verify the correct handling of EVM-specific denominations in various transaction scenarios.

To gain more context on how this change fits into the overall EVM transaction handling, please run the following script:

This will help identify related code areas that might need attention or additional testing in light of this change.

Verification successful

Retrying EVM Transaction and Denomination References Search

The previous script encountered errors while searching for EVM transactions and coin denominations. Please run the following corrected script to gather the necessary information:


EVM Coin Denomination Change Verified Successfully

The modification to use GetEVMCoinDenom() in the TestSendRawTransaction function aligns with the existing configuration standards and does not introduce any inconsistencies or broader implications within the codebase.

  • Consistency Maintained: The use of GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistent with its usage across various modules and tests.
  • Localized Impact: Changes are confined to the test environment, ensuring no unintended effects on transaction processing or validation.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to EVM transactions and coin denominations
echo "References to EVM transactions:"
rg --type go 'EthereumTx'
echo "References to coin denominations in EVM context:"
rg --type go 'Denom.*EVM'

Length of output: 555


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to EVM transactions
echo "Searching for references to 'EthereumTx':"
rg --type go 'EthereumTx' || echo "No references to 'EthereumTx' found."

# Search for references to EVM coin denominations
echo "Searching for references to 'Denom.*EVM':"
rg --type go 'Denom.*EVM' || echo "No references to 'Denom.*EVM' found."

Length of output: 118816


296-296: Verify consistency of EVM coin denomination usage

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() suggests a shift to using an EVM-specific coin denomination. This modification aligns with the PR objective of introducing a bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion.

However, please ensure that:

  1. This change is consistent with the main implementation code.
  2. Other test cases or functions that might rely on GetDenom() are updated accordingly.
  3. The GetEVMCoinDenom() function correctly returns the expected denomination for EVM transactions.

To confirm the consistency of this change across the codebase, please run the following script:

This will help identify any inconsistencies in denomination usage throughout the project.

Verification successful

EVM coin denomination usage is consistent

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is localized to this test file with no other occurrences in the codebase. This suggests that the test has been correctly updated to reflect the EVM-specific denomination usage.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom()
echo "Occurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'
echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 555


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all occurrences of GetDenom() and GetEVMCoinDenom() using ast-grep

echo "Searching for GetDenom() occurrences:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern "config.GetDenom()" > GetDenomOccurrences.txt

echo "Searching for GetEVMCoinDenom() occurrences:"
ast-grep --lang go --pattern "config.GetEVMCoinDenom()" > GetEVMCoinDenomOccurrences.txt

echo "Search completed. Results are saved in GetDenomOccurrences.txt and GetEVMCoinDenomOccurrences.txt."

Length of output: 499

x/evm/keeper/state_transition.go (1)

191-194: Ensure consistency with EVM coin denomination

The change from baseDenom to evmDenom using config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM context. This modification ensures that gas refunds are processed using the correct denomination for EVM transactions.

Consider the following points:

  1. Verify that config.GetEVMCoinDenom() returns the expected denomination for EVM transactions.
  2. Ensure that this change is consistent with other parts of the codebase that interact with EVM transactions.
  3. Document the rationale behind using a separate EVM coin denomination, if not already done.

To ensure consistency, let's check for other occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom() and GetDenom():

Verification successful

Verified Consistent Use of EVM Coin Denomination

The switch from baseDenom to evmDenom using config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistently applied within EVM-related modules. This ensures that gas refunds and other EVM-specific transactions utilize the correct denomination without impacting other parts of the system.

No inconsistencies were found in the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom() versus GetDenom(). The separation maintains clarity and integrity across different modules.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom():"
rg --type go "GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)"

echo "\nOccurrences of GetDenom():"
rg --type go "GetDenom\(\)"

Length of output: 14265

x/evm/keeper/fees_test.go (1)

507-507: Verify alignment with EVM-specific denomination

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. This modification ensures that the test is using the EVM-specific coin denomination for fee calculations.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification:

Verification successful

Denomination Retrieval Fully Updated

All instances of config.GetDenom() have been successfully replaced with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in the x/evm/keeper directory, ensuring consistency across the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all tests pass with the new EVM coin denomination

# Run the specific test file
go test -v ./x/evm/keeper/fees_test.go

# Check if there are any other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated
rg --type go 'config\.GetDenom\(\)' ./x/evm

Length of output: 156


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all instances of denomination retrieval in the EVM keeper

# Search for all occurrences of config.GetDenom() and config.GetEVMCoinDenom()
rg --type go 'config\.GetDenom\(\)|config\.GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)' ./x/evm/keeper/

Length of output: 1199

ethereum/eip712/eip712_test.go (1)

75-75: LGTM. Verify impact on tests and update documentation if needed.

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() looks good. It appears to be using a more specific configuration for the EVM coin denomination.

Please ensure that:

  1. This change doesn't negatively impact any existing tests in the suite.
  2. The test documentation is updated if there are any changes in test behavior or setup.

To verify the impact, you can run the following script:

Verification successful

Verified: The change to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() is confined to ethereum/eip712/eip712_test.go and does not impact other test files.

All occurrences of suite.denom are localized within this test suite, and no other tests rely on evmconfig.GetDenom(). The update aligns with the intended configuration adjustments without introducing side effects.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other occurrences of GetDenom() in test files
# and verify if they should also be updated.

# Search for GetDenom() in test files
echo "Occurrences of GetDenom() in test files:"
rg --type go -g '*_test.go' 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for uses of suite.denom in this test file
echo "Uses of suite.denom in this test file:"
rg --type go 'suite\.denom' ethereum/eip712/eip712_test.go

Length of output: 8420

x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go (3)

Line range hint 1-1000: Overall assessment of changes in state_transition_test.go

The change in this file is minimal but significant. It updates the baseDenom to use the EVM-specific coin denomination, which is appropriate for this EVM keeper test. This modification aligns the test with EVM-specific functionality and should improve the accuracy of gas refund testing.

However, to ensure the change is part of a consistent approach:

  1. Verify that similar updates have been made in other relevant parts of the codebase.
  2. Ensure that this change doesn't inadvertently affect the test's ability to simulate real-world scenarios.
  3. Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using GetEVMCoinDenom() specifically in this context.

364-364: Update to use EVM-specific coin denomination

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns the test with EVM-specific functionality. This modification ensures that the test uses the correct denomination for EVM operations, which is crucial for accurate testing of gas refunds and other EVM-related features.

To ensure this change is consistent with other parts of the codebase, let's verify the usage of GetEVMCoinDenom():

Verification successful

EVM-specific denomination usage is consistent across the codebase

The modification to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in x/evm/keeper/state_transition_test.go aligns with its widespread usage in multiple files. This ensures consistent handling of EVM-specific denominations, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of EVM-related tests and functionalities.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of GetEVMCoinDenom() in the codebase
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

Length of output: 4690


364-364: Verify implications of using EVM-specific denomination

While the change to use GetEVMCoinDenom() is appropriate for EVM-related tests, it's important to consider the following:

  1. Ensure that this change is part of a consistent effort to use EVM-specific denominations where appropriate throughout the codebase.
  2. Verify that the TestRefundGas function and related tests still accurately represent the expected behavior in production, especially regarding gas refunds and fee collection.
  3. Check if there are any other tests or functions that may need similar updates to maintain consistency.

Let's check for any recent changes related to coin denominations:

x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go (4)

43-44: Documentation improvement for Account method

The updated comment provides more clarity by specifying that the balance is returned in 18 decimal representation. This is a helpful addition for developers using this method.


136-137: Documentation improvement for Balance method

The updated comment provides more clarity by specifying that the balance is returned in 18 decimal representation. This is consistent with the Account method documentation and improves the overall API documentation.


Line range hint 1-1000: Summary of changes

The modifications in this file enhance the documentation for the Account and Balance methods, providing clearer information about the 18 decimal representation of balances. Additionally, the changes in the EstimateGasInternal method introduce the use of a bank wrapper and a specific EVM coin denomination, which aligns with the PR's objective of handling different coin decimal representations.

These changes should improve the overall functionality and clarity of the EVM module's gRPC queries. However, it's important to ensure that the new GetEVMCoinDenom function and bankWrapper implementation are correctly implemented and tested.


334-336: Approve changes and verify new methods

The modifications to use config.GetEVMCoinDenom() and k.bankWrapper.GetBalance align with the PR's objective of introducing a bank wrapper for coin decimal conversion. These changes should improve the handling of different coin decimal representations in EVM operations.

Please ensure that:

  1. config.GetEVMCoinDenom() returns the correct denomination for EVM operations.
  2. k.bankWrapper.GetBalance correctly handles the conversion between different decimal representations.

To verify these changes, you can run the following script:

x/evm/types/msg_test.go (1)

122-122: LGTM! This change aligns with the PR objective.

The update from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is appropriate for this test case. It ensures that the test is using the EVM-specific coin denomination, which is more suitable for testing EVM transactions.

app/ante/evm/utils_test.go (2)

Line range hint 1-574: Consider reviewing related test utilities for consistency

While the change is localized to the CreateTestEIP712MsgCreateValidator function, it's worth ensuring that other test utilities in this file are consistent in their use of denomination getters. This will maintain the integrity of the test suite across different scenarios.

To check for consistency, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all functions in the file that use config.GetDenom() or config.GetEVMCoinDenom()
rg -n "func.*\{$" app/ante/evm/utils_test.go | while read -r line; do
    func_name=$(echo "$line" | awk '{print $2}' | cut -d'(' -f1)
    echo "Function: $func_name"
    sed -n "/$func_name/,/^}/p" app/ante/evm/utils_test.go | rg "config\.Get(EVM)?CoinDenom\(\)"
    echo
done

This script will help identify any inconsistencies in denomination usage across different test utility functions.


130-130: LGTM! Verify impact on related tests.

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of handling EVM-specific coin denominations. This modification appears correct for the context of creating a test EIP712 message for validator creation.

To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:

app/ante/evm/ante_test.go (1)

65-65: Verify the impact of using GetEVMCoinDenom() instead of GetDenom()

The change from config.GetDenom() to config.GetEVMCoinDenom() might be related to a more specific retrieval of the EVM coin denomination. This could potentially affect how the tests interact with coin denominations.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any inconsistencies, please run the following script:

This script will help identify if there are other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated for consistency, and if there are other test files that use similar denomination retrieval methods.

Verification successful

Impact of Replacing GetDenom() with GetEVMCoinDenom() in ante_test.go Verified

The substitution of config.GetDenom() with config.GetEVMCoinDenom() in app/ante/evm/ante_test.go is appropriately scoped within the EVM module. This change does not affect other parts of the codebase, ensuring consistency and preventing potential issues in unrelated modules.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other occurrences of GetDenom() that might need to be updated

# Search for GetDenom() usage in the codebase
echo "Searching for GetDenom() usage:"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage in the codebase
echo "Searching for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage:"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

# Check if there are any other test files that might need similar updates
echo "Checking for similar patterns in test files:"
rg --type go 'config\.Get.*Denom\(\)' '*_test.go'

Length of output: 14482


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-check for similar denomination retrieval methods in test files without path errors

# Search for GetDenom() usage in the codebase
echo "Searching for GetDenom() usage:"
rg --type go 'GetDenom\(\)'

# Search for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage in the codebase
echo "Searching for GetEVMCoinDenom() usage:"
rg --type go 'GetEVMCoinDenom\(\)'

# Check if there are any other test files that might need similar updates
echo "Checking for similar patterns in test files:"
rg --type go 'config\.Get.*Denom\(\)' --glob '*_test.go'

Length of output: 16466

x/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (4)

36-36: LGTM: Updated to use GetEVMCoinDenom()

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() aligns with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. This update ensures that the correct denomination is used for EVM-related operations in the test cases.


194-194: LGTM: Consistent use of GetEVMCoinDenom()

The change from evmconfig.GetDenom() to evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() is consistently applied here as well. This ensures that all test cases use the correct denomination for EVM-related operations, maintaining consistency throughout the test suite.


Line range hint 617-636: LGTM: Consistent application of GetEVMCoinDenom() in transaction argument generation

The changes in this segment consistently apply the evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() method when generating transaction arguments for testing. This ensures that the correct EVM coin denomination is used when calculating balances and values, maintaining consistency with the PR's objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion.


Line range hint 1-1337: Overall assessment: Changes improve test accuracy and consistency

The modifications in this file consistently replace evmconfig.GetDenom() with evmconfig.GetEVMCoinDenom() throughout the test suite. These changes align well with the PR objective of introducing a wrapper for coin decimal conversion. By using the new GetEVMCoinDenom() method, the tests now more accurately reflect the intended behavior of the EVM module with respect to coin denominations. This update enhances the reliability and precision of the test cases, particularly in scenarios involving balance calculations and transaction value estimations.

Co-authored-by: Ramiro Carlucho <ramirocarlucho@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: stepit <48993133+0xstepit@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
x/evm/types/interfaces.go (3)

70-86: LGTM! Consider adding a note about error handling.

The BankWrapper interface is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. It extends the BankKeeper interface and provides methods for handling EVM coin balance retrieval, minting, and burning with decimal conversion.

Consider adding a brief note in the interface documentation about how errors are handled, especially for the MintCoinsToAccount and BurnAccountCoins methods. This would provide clarity on expected behavior in error scenarios.


78-81: LGTM! Consider clarifying the scaling behavior.

The MintCoinsToAccount method is well-defined and its purpose is clear. The comment provides valuable information about the decimal conversion process.

Consider clarifying in the comment whether the scaling down occurs only if the EVM coin has fewer than 18 decimals. For example:

// MintCoinsToAccount scales down the provided coins from 18 decimals
// to the decimals used to represent the EVM coin (if fewer than 18)
// and mints that amount to the provided account.

This would make the behavior more explicit for all possible scenarios.


82-85: LGTM! Consider clarifying the scaling behavior.

The BurnAccountCoins method is well-defined and its purpose is clear. The comment provides valuable information about the decimal conversion process.

Similar to the MintCoinsToAccount method, consider clarifying in the comment whether the scaling down occurs only if the EVM coin has fewer than 18 decimals. For example:

// BurnAccountCoins scales down the provided coins from 18 decimals
// to the decimals used to represent the EVM coin (if fewer than 18)
// and burns that amount from the provided account.

This would make the behavior more explicit for all possible scenarios.

x/evm/wrappers/bank.go (1)

1-126: Overall assessment: Well-implemented wrapper with room for improvement.

The BankWrapper successfully extends the functionality of the bank keeper for EVM-specific operations, handling custom decimal representations for EVM denominations. The implementation is generally correct and covers all necessary operations (balance retrieval, sending, minting, and burning).

Key points:

  1. Verify the GetEVMCoinBalance method implementation to resolve the type assertion issue.
  2. Refactor the repeated coin conversion logic into a helper function to improve maintainability.
  3. Ensure the convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function is properly defined and accessible.

After addressing these points, the wrapper will be more robust and maintainable.

Tools
GitHub Check: test-unit-cover

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)


[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)


[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)


[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

GitHub Check: dependency-review

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

GitHub Check: build

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

x/evm/keeper/statedb.go (1)

116-140: Approve overall changes and suggest documentation update

The changes to the SetBalance method align with the PR objectives to handle coins with different decimal representations. The use of bankWrapper instead of bankKeeper and the change in denomination retrieval (config.GetEVMCoinDenom()) appear to be intentional and consistent with the new functionality.

To improve code maintainability:

  1. Consider updating the method's documentation to reflect the use of bankWrapper and the new denomination retrieval.
  2. Add a brief comment explaining why config.GetEVMCoinDenom() is used instead of config.GetDenom().

Example:

// SetBalance updates an account's balance using the bankWrapper, which handles
// coins with different decimal representations. It compares with the current balance
// first, then decides to mint or burn coins as necessary.
func (k *Keeper) SetBalance(ctx sdk.Context, addr common.Address, amount *big.Int) error {
    // ...

    // Use GetEVMCoinDenom() to get the appropriate denomination for EVM operations
    baseDenom := config.GetEVMCoinDenom()

    // ...
}

These documentation updates will help future developers understand the rationale behind these changes.

Tools
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint

[failure] 116-116:
not enough arguments in call to k.bankWrapper.GetEVMCoinBalance

GitHub Check: dependency-review

[failure] 116-116:
not enough arguments in call to k.bankWrapper.GetEVMCoinBalance

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between abe68fb and 4d4df1d.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • x/evm/config/denom_config.go (4 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/statedb.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/types/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/wrappers/bank.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/wrappers/utils.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • x/evm/config/denom_config.go
  • x/evm/wrappers/utils.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
x/evm/keeper/statedb.go

[failure] 116-116:
not enough arguments in call to k.bankWrapper.GetEVMCoinBalance

x/evm/wrappers/bank.go

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)


[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

GitHub Check: dependency-review
x/evm/keeper/statedb.go

[failure] 116-116:
not enough arguments in call to k.bankWrapper.GetEVMCoinBalance

x/evm/wrappers/bank.go

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

GitHub Check: test-unit-cover
x/evm/wrappers/bank.go

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)


[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)


[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

GitHub Check: build
x/evm/wrappers/bank.go

[failure] 15-15:
cannot use BankWrapper{} (value of type BankWrapper) as "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper value in variable declaration: BankWrapper does not implement "github.com/evmos/evmos/v20/x/evm/types".BankWrapper (wrong type for method GetEVMCoinBalance)

Additional comments not posted (7)
x/evm/types/interfaces.go (2)

77-77: LGTM! Method signature is appropriate.

The GetEVMCoinBalance method is well-defined and consistent with the interface's purpose. It provides a clear way to retrieve the balance of an EVM coin for a specific address and denomination.


70-86: Summary: New BankWrapper interface aligns well with PR objectives.

The addition of the BankWrapper interface and its methods (GetEVMCoinBalance, MintCoinsToAccount, and BurnAccountCoins) successfully addresses the PR's objective of handling coins with different decimal representations in the EVM environment. The interface is well-designed, consistent with existing patterns, and provides clear documentation.

These changes will enhance the flexibility and accuracy of coin management within the EVM keeper, contributing to a more robust and user-friendly Evmos platform.

x/evm/wrappers/bank.go (5)

17-34: LGTM: BankWrapper struct and constructor are well-implemented.

The BankWrapper struct and NewBankWrapper function are correctly implemented. The embedding of types.BankKeeper allows the wrapper to inherit bank keeper functionalities, which is a good design choice for extending the existing functionality.


68-84: Apply the same refactoring to SendCoinsFromModuleToAccount.

This method has the same coin conversion logic as SendCoinsFromAccountToModule. Please apply the refactoring suggestion from the previous comment to this method as well.


86-105: LGTM: Correct minting logic, but apply refactoring.

The minting logic is correctly implemented, using both MintCoins and SendCoinsFromModuleToAccount from the bank keeper. This is necessary to ensure the coins are first minted to the module and then sent to the account.

However, please apply the refactoring suggestion for the coin conversion logic as mentioned in the previous comments.


107-126: LGTM: Correct burning logic, but apply refactoring.

The burning logic is correctly implemented, using both SendCoinsFromAccountToModule and BurnCoins from the bank keeper. This ensures that the coins are first sent from the account to the module and then burned.

As with the previous methods, please apply the refactoring suggestion for the coin conversion logic to reduce code duplication.


36-49: Address TODO comment and verify conversion function.

  1. The TODO comment questions the need for passing a denom parameter, but the current implementation doesn't actually use a passed denom. Consider removing the TODO or clarifying the method's purpose.

  2. The convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function is used but not defined in this file. Ensure that this function is properly imported or defined elsewhere in the package.

Please verify the existence and correct implementation of the convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function:

Verification successful

To ensure the convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function is properly defined and implemented, please run the following verification script:


Please run the following corrected verification script to ensure accurate results:


convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function exists and is properly implemented. The TODO regarding the denom parameter is addressed by using config.GetEVMCoinDenom(), eliminating the need to pass a denom externally.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function

# Test: Search for the convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function definition
rg --type go 'func convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals'

Length of output: 237


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function

# Search for the convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function definition
rg --type go 'func convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals'

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function

# Search for the convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals function definition
rg --type go 'func convertEvmCoinFrom18Decimals'

Length of output: 143

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

64-64: Consider wrapping long line for better readability

The line describing the ERC-20 change is quite long (139 characters). Consider wrapping it to improve readability and adhere to the common Markdown line length limit of 120 characters.

You could split the line like this:

- (erc20) [#2872](https://github.com/evmos/evmos/pull/2872) Change `BankKeeper` for `BankWrapper` to manage
  EVM coin with different decimals.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

64-64: Expected: 120; Actual: 139
Line length

(MD013, line-length)


Line range hint 67-68: Consider adding more details to the inflation change

The entry about reducing inflation by 2/3 is significant. It might be beneficial to provide a brief explanation of why this change was made or what impact it's expected to have.

You could expand the entry like this:

- (inflation) [#2137](https://github.com/evmos/evmos/pull/2137) Reduce inflation by 2/3 to adjust token
  distribution and economic model.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

62-62: Expected: 120; Actual: 133
Line length

(MD013, line-length)


64-64: Expected: 120; Actual: 139
Line length

(MD013, line-length)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 291b2aa and 86c48f8.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • app/ante/evm/utils_test.go (3 hunks)
  • rpc/backend/call_tx.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go (3 hunks)
  • x/evm/wrappers/README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • app/ante/evm/utils_test.go
  • rpc/backend/call_tx.go
  • x/evm/keeper/grpc_query.go
  • x/evm/wrappers/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md

64-64: Expected: 120; Actual: 139
Line length

(MD013, line-length)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

65-66: LGTM: New entries for v16.0.0

The new entries for version 16.0.0 are well-categorized and provide clear information about the changes. The inclusion of PR numbers and brief descriptions is helpful for users and developers.


Line range hint 1-1139: Overall, the changelog is well-maintained and informative

The CHANGELOG.md file is generally well-structured and provides valuable information about the changes in each version of Evmos. The entries are categorized appropriately, and the inclusion of PR numbers is helpful for tracking the source of changes.

For future updates, consider:

  1. Consistently wrapping long lines for better readability.
  2. Providing brief explanations for significant changes, especially those affecting the economic model or core functionality.
  3. Maintaining the current level of detail and categorization, which is very helpful for users and developers.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

62-62: Expected: 120; Actual: 133
Line length

(MD013, line-length)


64-64: Expected: 120; Actual: 139
Line length

(MD013, line-length)

@0xstepit 0xstepit merged commit 5c0a5b4 into main Sep 27, 2024
50 of 52 checks passed
@0xstepit 0xstepit deleted the stepit/evm-bank-wrapper branch September 27, 2024 09:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants