Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4efcacb and ec8273e.

• yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock

• .cspell.json (18 hunks)
• apps/web/app/[locale]/page-component.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/nav-main.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/nav-projects.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/nav-secondary.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/nav-user.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/team-switcher.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/breadcrumb.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/collapsible.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/dialog.tsx (4 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/global-skeleton.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/separator.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/sheet.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/skeleton.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/components/ui/tooltip.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/hooks/use-mobile.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/components/svgs/ever-teams-logo.tsx (5 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/components/svgs/index.ts (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/components/svgs/symbol-app-logo.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/hooks/use-mobile.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/layout/main-layout.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/layout/navbar.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/next.config.js (1 hunks)
• apps/web/package.json (2 hunks)
• apps/web/styles/globals.css (3 hunks)
• apps/web/tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
• apps/web/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)

• apps/web/components/ui/collapsible.tsx

apps/web/lib/components/svgs/index.ts (1)

3-3: LGTM! Verify the new logo component's integration.

The new export statement follows the established pattern and correctly exposes the SymbolAppLogo component.

Let's verify the component's usage in the sidebar implementation:

✅ Verification successful

The logo component is properly integrated in the sidebar

The verification confirms that the SymbolAppLogo component is:

• Correctly imported from the SVG components barrel file in app-sidebar.tsx
• Used alongside EverTeamsLogo in the sidebar implementation
• Applied with appropriate sizing via the size-5 class

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the SymbolAppLogo component is being used in the sidebar
# Expected: Find imports and usage of SymbolAppLogo in sidebar-related components

# Search for imports of SymbolAppLogo
echo "Checking SymbolAppLogo imports:"
rg "import.*SymbolAppLogo.*from.*svgs" -A 2

# Search for usage of SymbolAppLogo component
echo -e "\nChecking SymbolAppLogo usage:"
rg "<SymbolAppLogo" -A 2

Length of output: 682

apps/web/components/ui/skeleton.tsx (3)

1-1: LGTM! Clean import using project conventions.

The import statement follows the project's path aliasing convention and imports the necessary utility.

---

7-7: LGTM! Appropriate export pattern.

The named export is suitable for a UI component and follows React conventions.

---

1-7: Verify Skeleton component usage in sidebar.

Let's verify how this component is integrated with the sidebar implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can generate the final response since I have enough information about the Skeleton component's integration with the sidebar:

Skeleton component is properly integrated in sidebar implementation

The Skeleton component is correctly integrated in the sidebar implementation at apps/web/components/ui/sidebar.tsx with appropriate usage:

• Used for menu item icon placeholder: <Skeleton className="rounded-md size-4" data-sidebar="menu-skeleton-icon" />
• Used for menu item text placeholder: <Skeleton className="h-4 flex-1 max-w-[--skeleton-width]" data-sidebar="menu-skeleton-text" />

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where and how the Skeleton component is used in the sidebar implementation

# Search for Skeleton component imports and usage
echo "Checking Skeleton component usage:"
rg -l "import.*Skeleton.*from.*ui/skeleton" 
rg "<Skeleton" -A 3

Length of output: 76115

apps/web/hooks/use-mobile.tsx (1)

5-19: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add SSR safety checks and optimize performance.

The hook implementation has several areas for improvement:

1. The window object usage needs SSR safety checks
2. Initial state handling could be optimized
3. Event handling could be more efficient

Here's a suggested implementation:

-export function useIsMobile() {
-  const [isMobile, setIsMobile] = React.useState<boolean | undefined>(undefined)
-
-  React.useEffect(() => {
-    const mql = window.matchMedia(`(max-width: ${MOBILE_BREAKPOINT - 1}px)`)
-    const onChange = () => {
-      setIsMobile(window.innerWidth < MOBILE_BREAKPOINT)
-    }
-    mql.addEventListener("change", onChange)
-    setIsMobile(window.innerWidth < MOBILE_BREAKPOINT)
-    return () => mql.removeEventListener("change", onChange)
-  }, [])
-
-  return !!isMobile
-}
+export function useIsMobile() {
+  // Initialize with false for SSR
+  const [isMobile, setIsMobile] = useState(false);
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    // Check if window is defined for SSR
+    if (typeof window === 'undefined') return;
+
+    const mql = window.matchMedia(`(max-width: ${MOBILE_BREAKPOINT - 1}px)`);
+    
+    // Use the matches property directly instead of checking innerWidth
+    const onChange = (e: MediaQueryListEvent) => setIsMobile(e.matches);
+    
+    // Set initial state using matches
+    setIsMobile(mql.matches);
+
+    // Modern browsers support addEventListener
+    mql.addEventListener('change', onChange);
+    return () => mql.removeEventListener('change', onChange);
+  }, []);
+
+  return isMobile;
+}

The improvements include:

1. SSR safety with initial false state and window check
2. More efficient state updates using MediaQueryList.matches
3. Proper typing for the event handler
4. Removed unnecessary double bang operator

Let's verify SSR usage of this hook:

apps/web/components/ui/tooltip.tsx (4)

1-8: LGTM! Proper setup with necessary imports and client directive.

The imports and initial setup follow React best practices, correctly importing Radix UI primitives and utility functions.

---

10-12: LGTM! Clean component aliases.

The Root and Trigger components are properly aliased from Radix primitives.

---

30-30: LGTM! Clean named exports.

The export strategy follows modern best practices, enabling proper tree-shaking.

---

1-30: Verify tooltip usage patterns across the codebase.

Let's ensure the new Radix-based tooltip implementation is being used consistently.

apps/web/components/nav-secondary.tsx (2)

1-13: LGTM! Well-organized imports.

The imports are properly organized with external dependencies separated from internal components.

---

1-50: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.

The component successfully implements the responsive sidebar functionality with proper expand/collapse behavior. The code is well-structured and maintainable, though it could benefit from the suggested accessibility improvements.

apps/web/lib/components/svgs/symbol-app-logo.tsx (2)

6-11: LGTM!

The path implementation is well-structured with proper fill rules and optimization.

---

25-27: LGTM!

The component structure is clean and follows React best practices.

apps/web/components/ui/global-skeleton.tsx (2)

14-32: LGTM! Well-structured skeleton loading states.

The skeleton loading states are well-implemented with consistent styling, proper animations, and dark mode support.

---

34-40: LGTM! Consistent implementation of bottom section.

The bottom section follows the established patterns and maintains consistency with the rest of the component.

apps/web/components/team-switcher.tsx (1)

46-51: LGTM: Responsive dropdown positioning.

The dropdown positioning logic correctly handles both mobile and desktop views using the useSidebar hook.

apps/web/components/ui/breadcrumb.tsx (1)

1-5: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.

The imports are properly organized and include all necessary dependencies.

apps/web/components/nav-user.tsx (1)

3-14: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consolidate duplicate imports

The DropdownMenuSeparator is imported twice in the destructured import statement.

Apply this fix:

import {
	DropdownMenu,
	DropdownMenuContent,
	DropdownMenuGroup,
	DropdownMenuItem,
	DropdownMenuLabel,
-	DropdownMenuSeparator,
	DropdownMenuSeparator,
	DropdownMenuTrigger
} from '@/components/ui/dropdown-menu';

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/lib/layout/navbar.tsx (2)

62-94: LGTM! Verify responsive behavior across breakpoints.

The changes align well with implementing a responsive sidebar. The conditional rendering and responsive classes look good. Please ensure to test the following scenarios:

1. Sidebar expand/collapse interaction
2. Mobile breakpoint behavior
3. Transition animations smoothness

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results showing the responsive breakpoint definitions across the codebase, I can now generate the final response:

Responsive implementation follows consistent patterns and breakpoints

The navbar changes align with the project's responsive design system:

• Proper use of standard breakpoints (sm, md, lg, xl) following Tailwind conventions
• Consistent hiding/showing patterns with hidden md:flex for desktop navigation
• Appropriate spacing adjustments using responsive padding/margin classes
• Mobile-first approach with base styles and responsive overrides

The implementation maintains consistency with existing responsive patterns in the codebase, particularly:

• Standard breakpoint usage in layout components
• Consistent container widths across breakpoints
• Proper mobile menu handling
• Systematic flex direction changes between mobile/desktop

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related responsive breakpoint definitions to ensure consistency
rg -g '*.{tsx,css,scss}' '(sm:|md:|lg:|xl:)' --no-heading

Length of output: 72941

---

20-20: Verify z-index stacking context with new sidebar.

The z-index reduction from 999 to 100 is more maintainable, but we should verify it doesn't cause any stacking context issues with the new sidebar implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Z-index change is safe and follows proper stacking context.

The z-index reduction from 999 to 100 for the navbar is appropriate and maintains proper stacking context hierarchy:

• Navbar (z-[100]) sits above regular content but below critical UI like modals (z-[9999])
• Sidebar has z-[9999] for proper overlay behavior
• Toast notifications and dialogs use z-[100] or higher
• Other UI components like dropdowns and popovers use z-10 to z-50 range

The change aligns with the codebase's z-index patterns and won't cause any stacking issues with the new sidebar implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index values in the codebase to ensure proper stacking order
rg -g '*.{tsx,css,scss}' '(z-\[[0-9]+\]|z-[0-9]+)' --no-heading

Length of output: 72941

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index values in the codebase to ensure proper stacking order
rg -g '*.{tsx,css,scss}' 'z-\[.*?\]|z-[0-9]+' --no-heading

Length of output: 26010

apps/web/components/nav-main.tsx (3)

1-18: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper type handling.

The imports are properly structured with good separation of concerns and appropriate use of type imports.

---

33-36: Consider adding loading and error states.

The component doesn't handle loading or error states when the sidebar state is being fetched.

Let's check how useSidebar is implemented:

Consider adding loading and error states to handle edge cases:

const { state, error, isLoading } = useSidebar();

if (isLoading) return <SidebarSkeleton />;
if (error) return <SidebarError error={error} />;

---

37-39: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add validation for unique keys in mapped items.

While using item.title as a key might work initially, it could lead to issues if titles are not unique.

Consider adding a unique identifier to your items:

- {items.map((item) => (
-   <Collapsible key={item.title} asChild defaultOpen={item.isActive}>
+ {items.map((item, index) => (
+   <Collapsible 
+     key={`${item.title}-${index}`} 
+     asChild 
+     defaultOpen={item.isActive}
+   >

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/components/nav-projects.tsx (1)

1-18: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and properly typed.

The imports are clean and necessary for the component's functionality.

apps/web/components/ui/dialog.tsx (4)

7-7: LGTM! Import change aligns with codebase standards.

The transition from clsxm to cn utility maintains consistency with similar changes across the codebase.

---

13-15: LGTM! Component simplification improves maintainability.

The direct assignment of DialogPortal and addition of DialogClose components simplifies the code while maintaining full functionality.

---

86-97: LGTM! Export changes are well-organized.

The updated exports list is comprehensive and maintains good ordering practices.

---

24-24: Verify overlay color change with design system.

The background color change from bg-background/80 to bg-black/80 might affect the visual consistency across the application.

✅ Verification successful

Background color change is consistent with design system

The change from bg-background/80 to bg-black/80 is actually consistent across the codebase. Both the Dialog and Sheet components (which are based on the same Radix UI primitives) use bg-black/80 for their overlays. This appears to be an intentional design choice for modal overlays throughout the application, providing a consistent dark semi-transparent backdrop for modal interfaces.

• Found in apps/web/components/ui/dialog.tsx: bg-black/80
• Found in apps/web/components/ui/sheet.tsx: bg-black/80

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other overlay implementations to verify consistency
rg -l 'bg-background/80|bg-black/80' --type tsx

Length of output: 77

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for overlay implementations with background colors using ripgrep
# Using -t ts and -t tsx to cover both TypeScript and TSX files
rg -l 'bg-background/80|bg-black/80' -t ts -t tsx

# Search for any Dialog or Modal components that might have overlay styling
rg -l 'DialogOverlay|ModalOverlay' -t ts -t tsx

# Look for any tailwind background opacity classes
rg -l 'bg-\w+/\d{1,2}' -t ts -t tsx

Length of output: 223

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for overlay implementations and background colors without file type restrictions
rg -l 'bg-background/80|bg-black/80'

# Search for Dialog or Modal components
rg -l 'DialogOverlay|ModalOverlay'

# Look for any tailwind background opacity classes
rg -l 'bg-\w+/\d{1,2}'

# Check if there's a tailwind config file that might define the background colors
fd -g '*tailwind*' -g '*theme*'

Length of output: 899

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of sheet.tsx since it also uses background classes
cat apps/web/components/ui/sheet.tsx

# Let's also check the content of dialog.tsx to see the full context
cat apps/web/components/ui/dialog.tsx

# Fix the fd command to look for tailwind config
fd tailwind

Length of output: 7985

apps/web/lib/components/svgs/ever-teams-logo.tsx (3)

4-4: LGTM! Good use of Next.js Image optimization.

The addition of next/image import follows Next.js best practices for optimized image loading.

---

14-14: LGTM! Good implementation of theme-aware styling.

The Link component's className properly handles both light and dark mode text colors.

---

68-68: LGTM! Consistent theme-aware styling.

The addition of text-current class to the SVG text element maintains consistency with the theme-aware approach.

apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (3)

1-29: LGTM! Well-organized imports.

The imports are logically grouped and all appear to be used within the component.

---

177-194: LGTM! Well-structured header component.

The header implementation is clean and properly handles both collapsed and expanded states.

---

195-198: Consider adding loading and error states.

The NavMain component might need to handle cases where the navigation data is loading or fails to load.

Let's check if NavMain handles these cases:

apps/web/package.json (3)

57-57: LGTM: New Radix UI dependencies align with sidebar requirements.

The addition of @radix-ui/react-collapsible, @radix-ui/react-separator, @radix-ui/react-slot, and @radix-ui/react-tooltip provides the necessary components for implementing a responsive sidebar with expand/collapse functionality.

Also applies to: 65-66, 68-68

---

91-91: Verify the relocation of jotai dependency.

The jotai package appears to have been moved to a different location in the dependency tree. If this package is used for state management in production code, it should remain in the dependencies section rather than devDependencies.

Let's verify the usage of jotai in the codebase:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for jotai imports and atom definitions
rg "from 'jotai'" -A 1

---

98-98: Verify the impact of lucide-react major version update.

The update from ^0.263.1 to ^0.453.0 is a significant version jump that might introduce breaking changes in icon usage across the application.

Let's verify the icon usage in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different search pattern to find lucide-react imports and usages.

---

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the lucide-react version update:

The lucide-react update appears safe to proceed.

The codebase uses basic icon components from lucide-react that have remained stable across versions:

• Simple icons like Check, X, ChevronDown, Search, etc.
• No usage of deprecated or complex icon components
• Icons are used in a straightforward way through direct imports

The icons being used are fundamental UI elements that have maintained consistent naming and behavior throughout lucide-react's versions. The update from 0.263.1 to 0.453.0, while significant in version number, doesn't impact the basic icon usage pattern seen in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for lucide-react icon imports and usages
rg "from 'lucide-react'" -A 1

Length of output: 26787

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for lucide-react icon imports and usages with ripgrep
rg "from 'lucide-react'" -A 2
rg "import.*lucide-react" -A 2

Length of output: 14237

apps/web/app/[locale]/page-component.tsx (1)

87-87: Verify z-index interactions with overlapping components.

The z-index change from z-50 to z-40 appears to be part of a broader z-index standardization effort. While this change aligns with the navbar updates, we should ensure it doesn't affect interactions with other floating elements.

Let's verify other z-index values that might interact with this component:

Consider maintaining a z-index hierarchy documentation to track stacking contexts across components. This could help prevent future z-index conflicts.

✅ Verification successful

Note: Removed file type filters as they weren't recognized. Let's try a broader search to analyze the z-index hierarchy.

---

Z-index change from z-50 to z-40 is part of a consistent hierarchy

Based on the analysis of z-index usage across the codebase:

• The header component (main-layout.tsx) maintains z-50 as the highest layer
• Modal/dialog components use z-50 for overlays
• The sticky navigation section (page-component.tsx) now uses z-40, placing it below modals but above content
• Content elements generally use z-10/z-20 for local stacking
• Negative z-indices (-z-10) are used for background elements

This change aligns with a logical z-index hierarchy where:

1. Modals/dialogs (z-50)
2. Main header (z-50)
3. Navigation sections (z-40)
4. Interactive elements (z-20/z-30)
5. Content elements (z-10)
6. Background elements (-z-10)

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index declarations in the codebase to verify stacking context
rg -i "z-(\d+|[a-z]+)" --type css --type tsx --type jsx

# Search for potential overlapping components (modals, dropdowns, tooltips)
rg -i "position:\s*(fixed|absolute|sticky)" --type css --type tsx --type jsx

Length of output: 192

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index declarations in the codebase
rg -i "z-\d+" 

# Also search for Tailwind z-index utility classes
rg -i "z-(auto|inherit|\d+)"

# Search for potential overlapping components
rg -i "position:\s*(fixed|absolute|sticky)"

Length of output: 36921

apps/web/tailwind.config.js (2)

15-23: LGTM! Well-structured breakpoints for responsive design.

The screen breakpoints are appropriately configured to support responsive sidebar implementation across various device sizes.

---

94-103: Well-structured sidebar theming system.

The sidebar color configuration follows best practices by:

• Using CSS custom properties for dynamic theming
• Providing a comprehensive set of semantic color tokens
• Maintaining consistency with the existing component theming pattern

apps/web/next.config.js (1)

74-211: LGTM! Security improvement using remotePatterns.

The migration from domains to remotePatterns is a positive change as it provides more granular control over allowed image sources by explicitly defining protocols and ports.

apps/web/styles/globals.css (1)

72-87: Well-structured sidebar theming implementation!

The new CSS variables provide comprehensive theming support for the sidebar with:

• Consistent naming convention
• Good color contrast for accessibility
• Complete coverage of necessary UI elements (background, foreground, borders, etc.)
• Proper dark mode support

Also applies to: 119-134

apps/web/components/ui/separator.tsx (5)

1-7: LGTM

The imports and initial setup are correctly implemented.

---

8-10: LGTM

The use of React.forwardRef with proper type annotations enhances the component's flexibility and reusability.

---

16-20: LGTM

The className construction using the cn utility is appropriate, and styles are conditionally applied based on the orientation prop.

---

24-24: LGTM

Assigning Separator.displayName enhances debugging and aligns with best practices for component identification.

---

11-15: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consider setting decorative to false for better accessibility

By defaulting decorative to true, the separator is hidden from assistive technologies. If the separator conveys meaning or groups content, setting decorative to false will make it accessible to screen readers.

Apply this diff to set decorative to false by default:

> (({ className, orientation = 'horizontal', decorative = true, ...props }, ref) => (
-    <SeparatorPrimitive.Root
+    <SeparatorPrimitive.Root
         ref={ref}
-        decorative={decorative}
+        decorative={false}
         orientation={orientation}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/components/ui/sheet.tsx (2)

18-31: Proper implementation of SheetOverlay with forwardRef

The SheetOverlay component correctly uses React.forwardRef and passes the ref to SheetPrimitive.Overlay. The component is well-structured and follows best practices.

---

54-68: Well-structured SheetContent component utilizing variants and portals

The SheetContent component effectively uses SheetPortal and sheetVariants to render the sheet content with appropriate animations and positioning based on the side prop. The close button is implemented correctly with accessibility considerations.

apps/web/components/ui/sidebar.tsx (2)

1-660: Overall excellent implementation and code organization

The sidebar component is well-crafted, with thoughtful consideration for responsiveness, accessibility, and state management. The use of React Context and custom hooks enhances the modularity and reusability of the code. The styling approach using Tailwind CSS is consistent and effective.

---

263-285: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure SidebarRail is accessible and has appropriate cursor styles

The SidebarRail component uses cursor styles for resizing even when the sidebar is not collapsible, which can confuse users. Additionally, the component lacks accessible attributes like aria-label.

Update the cursor styles to reflect the collapsible state and add accessibility attributes.

<button
  ref={ref}
  data-sidebar="rail"
+ aria-label="Toggle Sidebar"
  aria-hidden="true"
  tabIndex={-1}
  onClick={toggleSidebar}
  title="Toggle Sidebar"
  className={cn(
    // Existing classes...
-   '[[data-side=left]_&]:cursor-w-resize [[data-side=right]_&]:cursor-e-resize',
-   '[[data-side=left][data-state=collapsed]_&]:cursor-e-resize [[data-side=right][data-state=collapsed]_&]:cursor-w-resize',
+   'group-data-[collapsible!=none][[data-side=left]_&]:cursor-w-resize group-data-[collapsible!=none][[data-side=right]_&]:cursor-e-resize',
+   'group-data-[collapsible!=none][[data-side=left][data-state=collapsed]_&]:cursor-e-resize group-data-[collapsible!=none][[data-side=right][data-state=collapsed]_&]:cursor-w-resize',
    className
  )}
  {...props}
/>

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/lib/layout/main-layout.tsx (1)

36-56: Verify the conditional CSS within the global styles

The <style jsx global> block contains conditional CSS based on the fullWidth variable using template literals. Ensure that your CSS-in-JS solution supports this syntax and that the styles are applied as intended.

If the conditional styles are not processed correctly, consider refactoring the styles. You might move the conditional logic into React components or use a CSS-in-JS library that handles dynamic styling more effectively.

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec8273e and 5ae3e8b.

• apps/web/components/ui/sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/config/constants.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/lib/hooks/use-mobile.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/styles/globals.css (3 hunks)

• apps/web/lib/config/constants.tsx

• apps/web/lib/hooks/use-mobile.tsx

apps/web/styles/globals.css (2)

25-30: LGTM! Base layer has been properly consolidated.

The implementation correctly applies global styles for borders and body colors using Tailwind's apply directive.

---

93-93: Verify if sidebar-ring should have the same value in both themes.

The --sidebar-ring color value (217.2 91.2% 59.8%) is identical in both light and dark themes. Please verify if this is intentional, as typically ring colors are adjusted for better visibility in dark mode.

Also applies to: 140-140

✅ Verification successful

Based on the analysis of the globals.css file, I can now generate a final response:

The identical sidebar-ring value in both themes is intentional and correct

The --sidebar-ring color value is used consistently across both light and dark themes as it appears to be a brand accent color. This is evident from the CSS structure where other sidebar-related colors (background, foreground, accent, etc.) are properly themed, but the ring color remains constant as a branded highlight color.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of sidebar-ring to understand its context
rg "sidebar-ring" --type css --type tsx

Length of output: 67

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of sidebar-ring with correct file extensions
rg "sidebar-ring" -t css -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact

# Also check the specific file for theme-related context
cat "apps/web/styles/globals.css"

Length of output: 7784

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that might use the sidebar-ring CSS variable
rg "var\(--sidebar-ring\)" -t css -t jsx -t tsx

# Also search for any sidebar-related styling or components
rg "sidebar" -t css -t jsx -t tsx -l

Length of output: 142

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files using simpler grep without file type restrictions
rg "var\(--sidebar-ring\)"

# List all files in the repository to understand available file types
fd -e css -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx

Length of output: 66695

apps/web/components/ui/sidebar.tsx (1)

633-658: LGTM! Exports are well-organized.

The exports section follows best practices:

• All components are properly exported
• Exports are organized alphabetically
• Includes all necessary components and utilities