Skip to content

Conversation

CREDO23
Copy link
Contributor

@CREDO23 CREDO23 commented Oct 24, 2024

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings

Previous screenshots

Please add here videos or images of previous status

Current screenshots

Please add here videos or images of previous status

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new hook for managing organization teams.
    • Enhanced daily plan retrieval to include all plans for better data access.
  • Performance Improvements

    • Optimized calculations for outstanding tasks using memoization to improve responsiveness and efficiency.
    • Improved filtering and mapping logic for outstanding tasks for better clarity and performance.

These changes enhance the user experience by providing more comprehensive data and improving the performance of notifications related to team tasks.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on the TeamOutstandingNotifications component, introducing the useOrganizationTeams hook for better management of team data. The method for retrieving daily plans has been updated to fetch all plans instead of just those for a specific employee. Additionally, the component's performance is enhanced through the use of useMemo for calculating outstanding tasks and their counts, ensuring that recalculations occur only when necessary. The effect's dependency array has also been modified to include activeTeam.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/lib/features/team/team-outstanding-notifications.tsx - Added useOrganizationTeams hook.
- Replaced getEmployeeDayPlans with getAllDayPlans in useDailyPlan.
- Updated useEffect dependency array to include activeTeam.
- Refactored outStandingTasksCount and employeeWithOutstanding to use useMemo for optimization.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Improvement

Suggested reviewers

  • evereq
  • Cedric921

Poem

In the team’s bright den, new hooks do play,
Fetching plans for all, not just one way.
With memoized tasks, our work is a breeze,
Outstanding counts rise, like leaves on the trees.
Hopping with joy, we celebrate this feat,
For every change made, our progress is sweet! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad26d9c and 2e78b2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/lib/features/team/team-outstanding-notifications.tsx (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/web/lib/features/team/team-outstanding-notifications.tsx (4)

2-2: LGTM! Import changes align with new functionality.

The addition of useOrganizationTeams and useMemo imports supports the new team-aware notification system and performance optimizations.

Also applies to: 8-8


19-20: LGTM! Team-aware notification system properly implemented.

The changes correctly implement team context awareness:

  1. Using getAllDayPlans instead of getEmployeeDayPlans for broader scope
  2. Properly integrating activeTeam into the dependency array

Also applies to: 24-25


55-58: LGTM! Effective performance optimization with useMemo.

The task count calculation is properly memoized with the correct dependency, preventing unnecessary recalculations when other parts of the component update.


134-150: Verify the date comparison logic for outstanding tasks.

While the memoization and filtering logic look good, there might be an inconsistency in the date comparison logic. The comment states "Notification will be displayed by next day", but the current implementation includes today's tasks:

const isTodayOrBefore = moment(plan.date).isSameOrBefore(moment().endOf('day'));

Consider excluding today's tasks to match the intended behavior:

-const isTodayOrBefore = moment(plan.date).isSameOrBefore(moment().endOf('day'));
+const isBeforeToday = moment(plan.date).isBefore(moment().startOf('day'));

Let's verify the intended behavior:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CREDO23 CREDO23 marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2024 05:33
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/lib/features/team/team-outstanding-notifications.tsx (1)

55-58: Consider if memoization is necessary for simple calculations

The memoization of outStandingTasksCount might be unnecessary overhead for this simple calculation. Consider removing it unless profiling shows performance benefits.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27c6fb8 and ad26d9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/lib/features/team/team-outstanding-notifications.tsx (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/lib/features/team/team-outstanding-notifications.tsx (1)

2-2: Verify team-specific data filtering in getAllDayPlans

The switch from getEmployeeDayPlans to getAllDayPlans broadens the data scope. Ensure that getAllDayPlans properly filters data for the selected team to prevent showing notifications from other teams.

Also applies to: 19-20

✅ Verification successful

Team filtering is properly implemented in getAllDayPlans

The implementation correctly filters data by team through the organizationTeamId parameter, which is passed from both client and server implementations. The switch from getEmployeeDayPlans to getAllDayPlans maintains proper team scope as:

  • Client-side API uses the active team ID: 'where[organizationTeamId]': activeTeamId || organizationTeamIdCookie
  • Server-side request requires organizationTeamId as a mandatory parameter
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for getAllDayPlans implementation to verify team filtering
ast-grep --pattern 'const getAllDayPlans = $_ => {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find getAllDayPlans implementation

# Search for getAllDayPlans in any context
rg "getAllDayPlans" -A 5

# Search for files containing DayPlan related code
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "DayPlan" -l

# Search specifically in hooks directory since it's imported from @app/hooks
fd -e ts -e tsx -p "hooks" | xargs rg "getAllDayPlans"

Length of output: 12625


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of getAllDayPlansAPI to verify team filtering
rg -A 10 "export function getAllDayPlansAPI" apps/web/app/services/client/api/daily-plan.ts

# Also check the server-side implementation
rg -A 10 "export function getAllDayPlans" apps/web/app/services/server/requests/daily-plan.ts

Length of output: 919

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants