Skip to content

Conversation

mdaigle
Copy link
Contributor

@mdaigle mdaigle commented Feb 26, 2025

When we make changes to SNI, it's important to test the changes in combination with MDS to avoid regressions. This PR adds the ability to trigger a pipeline run with an overridden SNI version pulled from the internal validation feed in ADO. This functionality is only available to pipeline runs within the ADO.Net project in ADO. Pipeline runs within the public project do not have access to the internal feed and will fail if an override version is set.

Proof that runs fail in public pipelines when sni override is set:
Project: https://sqlclientdrivers.visualstudio.com/public/_build/results?buildId=109913&view=results
Package: https://sqlclientdrivers.visualstudio.com/public/_build/results?buildId=109914&view=results

@mdaigle mdaigle changed the title Allow sni override for testing Allow sni version override for testing Feb 27, 2025
@mdaigle mdaigle marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 16:42
@mdaigle mdaigle requested a review from a team February 27, 2025 16:42
@mdaigle mdaigle force-pushed the dev/mdaigle/testing-sni-override branch from bf93c4d to 0d228f2 Compare February 27, 2025 17:06
Copy link
Contributor

@paulmedynski paulmedynski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just a few nitpicks.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.80%. Comparing base (17cb0b0) to head (2702322).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3184      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.96%   72.80%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         283      285       +2     
  Lines       58997    59137     +140     
==========================================
+ Hits        43048    43057       +9     
- Misses      15949    16080     +131     
Flag Coverage Δ
addons 92.58% <ø> (ø)
netcore 75.53% <ø> (-0.20%) ⬇️
netfx 71.15% <ø> (-0.21%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@benrr101 benrr101 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you and I should have a bit of a conversation about when and how the handful of components need to be tested together (MDS, SNI, AKV, MSS, ETC, WTF, BBQ). I want to get a better idea what depends on what and how the pipelines should be constructed to handle those situations. It's nothing that needs to block this specific PR, but since I think we will want to rebuild this pipeline as part of other engineering goals, I think we'll want to discuss it at some point.

@mdaigle mdaigle merged commit b242b89 into main Mar 10, 2025
252 checks passed
@mdaigle mdaigle deleted the dev/mdaigle/testing-sni-override branch March 10, 2025 16:26
@mdaigle mdaigle added this to the 7.0-preview1 milestone Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants