CoreCLR Support: fix #1782 - use TypeInfo instead of Type in codegen #1783
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nerated code.
|
@dotnet-bot retest Windows Debug and Release please |
|
Thanks @ReubenBond for the quick turnaround :) |
30 tasks
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1782.
Simple change, we use
GetTypeInfo()to when creating the field accessors for generated serializer classes.Since
GetTypeInfois an extension method, we also importSystem.Reflection. This is not anticipated to cause any ambiguity since we use fully qualified type names everywhere. If this becomes a problem we can certainly callGetTypeInfoas a static/non-extension method.