Skip to content

Conversation

crazy-max
Copy link
Contributor

follow-up #3634

adds lint target with its workflow job and cleanup old check behavior.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3640 (7548c31) into main (7846381) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3640   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.58%   56.58%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines        7520     7520           
=======================================
  Hits         4255     4255           
  Misses       2596     2596           
  Partials      669      669           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7846381...7548c31. Read the comment docs.

@milosgajdos milosgajdos requested a review from thaJeztah May 3, 2022 11:24
crazy-max added 2 commits May 4, 2022 11:12
Signed-off-by: CrazyMax <crazy-max@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: CrazyMax <crazy-max@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -48,10 +48,6 @@ version/version.go:
@echo "$(WHALE) $@"
./version/version.sh > $@

check: ## run all linters (TODO: enable "unused", "varcheck", "ineffassign", "unconvert", "staticheck", "goimports", "structcheck")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to keep check as an alias? Or are we ok with removing it? (not sure if there's people expecting make check to be there)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont think it's ever been used out of the GHA workflow context.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alrighty; works for me!

Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@milosgajdos milosgajdos merged commit 7a6b9e3 into distribution:main May 4, 2022
@crazy-max crazy-max deleted the lint branch May 4, 2022 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants