Skip to content

Conversation

mjlabe
Copy link
Contributor

@mjlabe mjlabe commented Aug 18, 2018

Added asm, c3, embeddedc, and labview, but I broke the wordmark classes for the icons that don't actually have wordmark icons (like c-plain-wordmark). Could someone please fix that before merging? Why does that exist anyway?

Copy link
Contributor

@iamclaytonray iamclaytonray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello! Thanks for sending a PR over. Can you please split each icon into individual pull requests? If you need help, please let me know. Thanks so much!

@mjlabe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjlabe commented Dec 12, 2018

Will do!

@Berkmann18
Copy link
Contributor

@mjlabe Also have a look at #11 where @konpa compiled a huge list of icons and where people commented suggestions.

@iamclaytonray
Copy link
Contributor

@Berkmann18 - this is definitely a great list and we can use this as a reference point moving forward but I'd like to keep PRs and issues restricted to a single icon at a time. Trying to manage a list of over 100 icons can be a little challenging and will inevitably become out of sync. With isolated issues and PRs, we can keep things tidy and improve changelogs. Thanks so much!

@Berkmann18
Copy link
Contributor

Berkmann18 commented Dec 12, 2018

@iamclaytonray Indeed, it would need a bit of cleaning and updates so that it can reflect all the suggestions in one place (which will help to avoid people making duplicate issues or duplicated comments).
But yes, I agree, having a 1 icon (or 1 set of related icons?) = 1 issue/PR is better.
Also using the project board would help in managing those (or Trello or Glo or something similar).

@iamclaytonray
Copy link
Contributor

Let's do an RFC and get this figured out! (I do agree having a central place of knowing what icons exist, which ones don't, etc is a good thing and like you said, will reduce dupes!)

@mjlabe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjlabe commented Dec 12, 2018

Should just add the icons in the PRs and leave the devicon.css alone?

@amacado amacado added the feature:icon PR when a new icon is ready to be added to the collection label Jun 8, 2020
@amacado amacado changed the title Newicons Newicons (c3, embeddedc, labview) Jun 8, 2020
Copy link
Member

@amacado amacado left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution. Please take a look at our updated contribution guidelines and pay special attention to:

  • Create a separated pull request for each icon (no matter how many variations)

Also you do no need to modify devicon.css and regenerate the fonts. We will do that after adding the icons because when multiple people doing pull requests the same time we will overwrite with the fonts.

@mjlabe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mjlabe commented Sep 6, 2020

Finally created PRs #282, #283, and #284. Please review and let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thank you.

@amacado
Copy link
Member

amacado commented Sep 6, 2020

I will close this pull request and review your new requests! :) Thanks in advance for your contribution @mjlabe

@amacado amacado closed this Sep 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature:icon PR when a new icon is ready to be added to the collection
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants