Skip to content

Conversation

xdustinface
Copy link

There's no need for class hierarchy with CBaseChainParams, it is just a struct with 2 fields.

1687cb4 Refactor: One CBaseChainParams should be enough (Jorge Timón)

Pull request description:

  There's no need for class hierarchy with CBaseChainParams, it is just a struct with 2 fields.
  This starts as a +10-43 diff

Tree-SHA512: 0a7dd64ab785416550b541787c6083540e4962d76b6cffa806bb3593aec2daf1752dfe65ac5cd51b34ad5c31dd8292c422b483fdd2d37d0b7e68725498ed4c2d
@xdustinface xdustinface added this to the 17 milestone Dec 10, 2020
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@xdustinface xdustinface merged commit 0e65473 into dashpay:develop Dec 10, 2020
gades pushed a commit to cosanta/cosanta-core that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
…ugh (dashpay#3865)

1687cb4 Refactor: One CBaseChainParams should be enough (Jorge Timón)

Pull request description:

  There's no need for class hierarchy with CBaseChainParams, it is just a struct with 2 fields.
  This starts as a +10-43 diff

Tree-SHA512: 0a7dd64ab785416550b541787c6083540e4962d76b6cffa806bb3593aec2daf1752dfe65ac5cd51b34ad5c31dd8292c422b483fdd2d37d0b7e68725498ed4c2d

Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants