Skip to content

Conversation

hannes
Copy link
Member

@hannes hannes commented Feb 7, 2025

No description provided.

@duckdb-draftbot duckdb-draftbot marked this pull request as draft February 7, 2025 15:10
@hannes hannes marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 15:10
@hannes
Copy link
Member Author

hannes commented Feb 7, 2025

cc @carlopi @samansmink

Copy link
Contributor

@carlopi carlopi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 (given CI is not really run here, good to go!)

@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit a2da1b9 into duckdb:main Feb 7, 2025
12 checks passed
Antonov548 added a commit to Antonov548/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
Parquet Reader: Implement dedicated Skip method (duckdb/duckdb#16117)
Using GitHub ARM runners for Linux CLI builds (duckdb/duckdb#16119)
krlmlr pushed a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2025
Parquet Reader: Implement dedicated Skip method (duckdb/duckdb#16117)
Using GitHub ARM runners for Linux CLI builds (duckdb/duckdb#16119)
krlmlr added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
Parquet Reader: Implement dedicated Skip method (duckdb/duckdb#16117)
Using GitHub ARM runners for Linux CLI builds (duckdb/duckdb#16119)
krlmlr added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
Parquet Reader: Implement dedicated Skip method (duckdb/duckdb#16117)
Using GitHub ARM runners for Linux CLI builds (duckdb/duckdb#16119)
krlmlr added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
Parquet Reader: Implement dedicated Skip method (duckdb/duckdb#16117)
Using GitHub ARM runners for Linux CLI builds (duckdb/duckdb#16119)
krlmlr added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request May 18, 2025
Parquet Reader: Implement dedicated Skip method (duckdb/duckdb#16117)
Using GitHub ARM runners for Linux CLI builds (duckdb/duckdb#16119)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants