Skip to content

Conversation

carlopi
Copy link
Contributor

@carlopi carlopi commented Feb 3, 2025

This reverts commit f6e1858 (also of mine).

This is needed since the new syntax (that deprecates the old one) is not supported by GCC 4.8 (or maybe there is some flag that can be passed, but not worth the effort)

Note that this (if test is enabled) shows quite some compilation warning that we might want to address, mostly uninitialized member initializations.
Example to CI run: https://github.com/carlopi/duckdb/actions/runs/13112778639/job/36580142875#step:3:1143

This reverts commit f6e1858.

This is needed since the new syntax (that deprecates the old one) is not supported by GCC 4.8
(or maybe there is some flag that can be passed, but not worth the effort)
@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit fb17337 into duckdb:v1.2-histrionicus Feb 3, 2025
50 checks passed
@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Mytherin commented Feb 3, 2025

Thanks!

@carlopi carlopi deleted the fix_gcc_488_compilation branch February 3, 2025 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants