Skip to content

Conversation

taniabogatsch
Copy link
Contributor

#15964

I was hoping we could copy the index without having to bind it, but that causes some issues. So, this PR addresses them by binding the index.

Fix https://github.com/duckdblabs/duckdb-internal/issues/4105
Fix https://github.com/duckdblabs/duckdb-internal/issues/4104

@carlopi
Copy link
Contributor

carlopi commented Jan 30, 2025

Do you happen to have a test where this makes a difference? Thanks!

@taniabogatsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

I could not reproduce the stable storage one you sent in the test runner - and the string inline one is already running in the nightlies. Should I give the storage test another shot?

@carlopi
Copy link
Contributor

carlopi commented Jan 30, 2025

I don't know, this was me being curious if you had found a way to reproduce in the unittester. If not, all cool.

@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit 0619672 into duckdb:v1.2-histrionicus Jan 31, 2025
45 of 47 checks passed
@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

@taniabogatsch taniabogatsch deleted the copy-db-fix branch January 31, 2025 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants