Skip to content

Conversation

peterboncz
Copy link
Contributor

@peterboncz peterboncz commented Oct 7, 2024

De not do the rewrite of a large IN-clause into a MarkJoin on remote Filter-Scans

This is MotherDuck-specific but should not affect other use cases.

(MotherDuck runs optimization server-side on remote FILTER-SCANs
and having the IN clause as a MarkJoin inhibits Hive partition
pruning server-side).

peter and others added 2 commits October 7, 2024 23:16
IN-clause is a filter that sits on top of a remote scan.

This is MotherDuck-sepcific but should not affect other use cases.

(MotherDuck runs optimization server-side on remote FILTER-SCANs
 and having the IN clause as a MarkJoin inhibits hive partition
 pruning server-side).
…aikled

(using a switch to the probably preferred casting logic)
@duckdb-draftbot duckdb-draftbot marked this pull request as draft October 8, 2024 13:21
@peterboncz peterboncz marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2024 13:40
@peterboncz peterboncz marked this pull request as draft October 11, 2024 13:24
@peterboncz peterboncz marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 13:25
@duckdb-draftbot duckdb-draftbot marked this pull request as draft October 11, 2024 13:40
@peterboncz peterboncz marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 13:40
@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit cc067e6 into duckdb:main Oct 12, 2024
43 checks passed
@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

github-actions bot pushed a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
delay the rewrite of a large IN-clause into a MarkJoin on remote Filter-Scans (duckdb/duckdb#14266)
github-actions bot added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
delay the rewrite of a large IN-clause into a MarkJoin on remote Filter-Scans (duckdb/duckdb#14266)

Co-authored-by: krlmlr <krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants