Skip to content

Conversation

Tishj
Copy link
Contributor

@Tishj Tishj commented Sep 16, 2024

Recently pybind11 added a new internal method and did not prefix it with __ so we have to add an explicit exclusion for it.

@Mytherin Mytherin merged commit 1f04f4d into duckdb:main Sep 16, 2024
15 checks passed
@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

github-actions bot pushed a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Create a balanced union tree, also for export (duckdb/duckdb#13956)
[Dev] Add exclusion for `pybind11` internal `_pybind11_conduit_v1_` method (duckdb/duckdb#13961)
[Swift] Update README.md in Swift repo (duckdb/duckdb#13955)
CI: Trigger actions for labeled discussions (duckdb/duckdb#13937)
github-actions bot added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Create a balanced union tree, also for export (duckdb/duckdb#13956)
[Dev] Add exclusion for `pybind11` internal `_pybind11_conduit_v1_` method (duckdb/duckdb#13961)
[Swift] Update README.md in Swift repo (duckdb/duckdb#13955)
CI: Trigger actions for labeled discussions (duckdb/duckdb#13937)

Co-authored-by: krlmlr <krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants