Make UNION BY NAME also use ForceMaxLogicalType, similar to UNION #11665
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I did some tests with structs: Which error as expected And this works, also expected: query I
select {'a': '0'} as c union all by name select {'a': 0} as c
----
{'a': 0}
{'a': 0} |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to duckdb/duckdb-r
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
Merge pull request duckdb/duckdb#11665 from Mytherin/unionbynametypes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes
UNION BY NAMEwork with types that are not implicitly castable to one another, which is the same behavior thatUNION ALLhas.