-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
Closed
Labels
Description
What happens?
Consider the following test case generated by my fuzzer. There should be an issue in either the second query or the third, since the second query return NULL
, and thus the third query should return an empty table. However, one row is fetched.
I built duckdb with CORE_EXTENSIONS='inet' GEN=ninja make
. It could also be triggered by nightly build of duckdb-java.
To Reproduce
CREATE TABLE t1(c0 INT, c1 INET);
INSERT INTO t1(c0, c1) VALUES (1, '192.168.1.1');
SELECT * FROM t1; -- 1 192.168.1.1
SELECT ((NULL, t1.c0, NULL)<>(t1.c1)) FROM t1; -- NULL
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE ((NULL, t1.c0, NULL)<>(t1.c1));
-- Expected: empty
-- Actual: 1 192.168.1.1
-- original test case found by TLP
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE ((NULL, t1.c0, NULL)<>(t1.c1)) UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE (NOT ((NULL, t1.c0, NULL)<>(t1.c1))) UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE ((((NULL, t1.c0, NULL)<>(t1.c1))) IS NULL);
-- 2 rows (unexpected)
OS:
Ubuntu 22.04
DuckDB Version:
v1.1.1-dev116 a2c119f
DuckDB Client:
CLI
Hardware:
No response
Full Name:
Suyang Zhong
Affiliation:
NUS
What is the latest build you tested with? If possible, we recommend testing with the latest nightly build.
I have tested with a source build
Did you include all relevant data sets for reproducing the issue?
Yes
Did you include all code required to reproduce the issue?
- Yes, I have
Did you include all relevant configuration (e.g., CPU architecture, Python version, Linux distribution) to reproduce the issue?
- Yes, I have