-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Feature 1 init #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@jprestop that's great that you and @georgemccabe made such great progress. Here are a couple thoughts to consider:
I know we'll have to modify the Dockerfiles in the MET repo, but we have to do that anyway to at least add "v0.1". Generally speaking, I think putting only the version number in the image tag name is preferable to stuffing more info in there (e.g. "minimum" vs "unit_test"). Might as well just stash the 2 different image types in 2 different DockerHub repos. |
@JohnHalleyGotway Thanks for the suggestions! The changes have been made, with the exception of the milestone "METbaseimage 0.1" because we will delete that tag and create a new tag "METbaseimage 1.0" which is really what we want. Please re-review, then after approval we will merge and re-tag. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes look great to me. I approve.
Thanks!
Pull Request Testing
Describe testing already performed for these changes:
Ensured GitHub actions built and pushed the images
Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
Review the files changed.
The image names are dtcenter/met-base:minimum_v0.1 and dtcenter/met-base:unit_test_v0.1 here.
Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [There is currently no documentation... ]
Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [Yes, but the MET build off this image will be tested later.]
Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [N/A]
If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
Please complete this pull request review by [20220829, if possible].
Pull Request Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Select: Reviewer(s)
Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes