Skip to content

Conversation

JohnHalleyGotway
Copy link
Collaborator

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway commented Jul 14, 2025

Expected Differences

  • Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

  • Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

Pull Request Testing

  • Describe testing already performed for these changes:

    Used workflow dispatch in this release-docker-images.yml run for this feature_3198_develop_scan_for_CVEs branch to build the dtcenter/met:12.0.2 image and confirmed that the steps now include the CVE scanning output, like this:
Screenshot 2025-07-14 at 2 57 13 PM

I downloaded the log artifact and confirmed it now contains the CVE scan output.

Archive:  /Users/johnhg/Downloads/logs_v12.0.2.zip
  inflating: CVE_Scan_dtcenter_met_12.0.2.log 
  • Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:

    Review GHA updates and inspect the CVE scan output.

  • Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [No]
    I made no updates to the MET documentation.

  • Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [No]
    None needed.

  • Will this PR result in changes to the MET test suite? [No]

    If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:

  • Will this PR result in changes to existing METplus Use Cases? [No]

    If yes, create a new Update Truth METplus issue to describe them.

  • Do these changes introduce new SonarQube findings? [No]

    If yes, please describe:

  • Please complete this pull request review by [Fri July 18, 2025].

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Review the source issue metadata (required labels, projects, and milestone).
  • Complete the PR definition above.
  • Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
  • Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
    Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
    Select: METplus-X.Y Support project for bugfix releases or MET-X.Y Development project for the next coordinated release
  • After submitting the PR, select the ⚙️ icon in the Development section of the right hand sidebar. Search for the issue that this PR will close and select it, if it is not already selected.
  • After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
  • Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway added this to the MET-12.1.0 milestone Jul 14, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🩺 Needs Triage in METplus-6.1 Development Jul 14, 2025
@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway linked an issue Jul 14, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
21 tasks
@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway moved this from 🩺 Needs Triage to 🔎 In review in METplus-6.1 Development Jul 14, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@jprestop jprestop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes are great, @JohnHalleyGotway! Thank you for all of your time and effort. I reviewed the GHA updates, noting the adding warning message and inspected the CVE scan output log file, CVE_Scan_dtcenter_met_12.0.2.log, which was as expected. I approve this request.

@JohnHalleyGotway JohnHalleyGotway merged commit 7defc18 into develop Jul 15, 2025
40 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🔎 In review to 🏁 Done in METplus-6.2 Development Jul 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🏁 Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add CVE scanning to the release-docker-images.yml workflow
2 participants