Skip to content

Enhance Point2Grid to support modified quality control settings for smoke/dust AOD data in GOES-16/17 as of April 16, 2024 #2853

@JohnHalleyGotway

Description

@JohnHalleyGotway

Describe the Enhancement

This issue arose from an email from Ho-Chun Huang on April 7, 2023. Per Amy Huff, as of April 16 (previously April 9th), 2023, a change will be made to the quality flags for the smoke and dust AOD data provided in GOES 16/17 files.

Per Ho-Chun, what matters to Points2Grid Smoke and Dust AOD processing probably is the reverse values of the smoke/dust detection confidence (in ADP files) for the Smoke and Dust AOD (detection confidence =0 is now high quality Smoke/Dust AOD).

This issue is to update the Point2Grid algorithm for the next version of MET.

Please be aware that the GOES-East/West ABI Aerosol Detection Product (ADP) smoke/dust mask current (Baseline) algorithm is being updated to the Enterprise algorithm tomorrow, April 9:
https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/messages/2024/04/MSG_20240404_1823.html

The "Smoke" and "Dust" variables in the ADP output file will remain the same, but other key variables/flag values for processing smoke/dust detections will change, as outlined in the following table.  Please update your scripts!

Screen Shot 2024-04-09 at 9 50 05 AM

This issue is to review the logic and documentation of the Point2Grid tool in MET:

  • Determine whether these changes are indicated by an updated version number in the data files... or whether they are based strictly on the timestamp. Either way, remember to add a new unit test that demonstrates the updated processing logic. And remember to confirm that data prior to April 9, 2024 continue to be processed in the "correct" way.
  • Confirm that the quality control confidence values are being parsed correctly from NEW files.
  • Confirm that the quality control confidence values are being parsed correctly from OLD files.
  • Remember to update the MET and METplus documentation, if needed.

Time Estimate

1 day?

Sub-Issues

Consider breaking the enhancement down into sub-issues.

Relevant Deadlines

List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.

Funding Source

2784543 UFS R2O

Define the Metadata

Assignee

  • Select engineer(s) or no engineer required
  • Select scientist(s) or no scientist required

Labels

  • Review default alert labels
  • Select component(s)
  • Select priority
  • Select requestor(s)

Milestone and Projects

  • Select Milestone as the next official version or Backlog of Development Ideas
  • For the next official version, select the MET-X.Y.Z Development project

Define Related Issue(s)

Consider the impact to the other METplus components.

Enhancement Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Complete the issue definition above, including the Time Estimate and Funding Source.
  • Fork this repository or create a branch of develop.
    Branch name: feature_<Issue Number>_<Description>
  • Complete the development and test your changes.
  • Add/update log messages for easier debugging.
  • Add/update unit tests.
  • Add/update documentation.
  • Push local changes to GitHub.
  • Submit a pull request to merge into develop.
    Pull request: feature <Issue Number> <Description>
  • Define the pull request metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
    Select: Milestone as the next official version
    Select: MET-X.Y.Z Development project for development toward the next official release
  • Iterate until the reviewer(s) accept and merge your changes.
  • Delete your fork or branch.
  • Close this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

Status

🏁 Done

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions