Skip to content

Bugfix: AERONET the lat/lon is not changed with different station ID #2493

@hsoh-u

Description

@hsoh-u

Replace italics below with details for this issue.

Describe the Problem

The AREONET version 3 has a variation of 6 line header which has lat/lon/elv columns. The lat/lon/elv should be updated when the SiteName is changed: "Tucson 32.233002 -110.953003 779" to "GSFC 38.9925 -76.839833 87"

The command at seneca:

/d1/projects/MET/MET_regression/develop/NB20230328/MET-develop/bin/ascii2nc /d1/projects/METplus/discussions/1888/Discussion1888/20230309.lev15 test_aeronet.nc -format aeronetv3

The AREONET input

AERONET_Site_Name	Site_Latitude(Degrees)	Site_Longitude(Degrees)	Site_Elevation(m)
Tucson	32.233002	-110.953003	779
Tucson	32.233002	-110.953003	779
Tucson	32.233002	-110.953003	779
GSFC	38.9925		-76.839833	 87
GSFC	38.9925		-76.839833	 87

The output of print_pointnc2ascii.py shows the same lat/lon/elv of "Tucson" for "GSFC"

AERONET_AOD Tucson	20230309_235841 32.2330 -110.9530 779 AOD	NA  550.00 NA    0.02957695
AERONET_AOD GSFC	20230309_121903 32.2330 -110.9530 779 AOD	NA 1640.00 NA    0.00589800
AERONET_AOD GSFC	20230309_121903 32.2330 -110.9530 779 AOD	NA 1020.00 NA    0.01574700

Expected Behavior

Provide a clear and concise description of what you expected to happen here.

The output of print_pointnc2ascii.py should be:

AERONET_AOD Tucson	20230309_235841 32.2330 -110.9530 779 AOD	NA  550.00 NA    0.02957695
AERONET_AOD GSFC	20230309_121903 38.9925  -76.8398  87 AOD	NA 1640.00 NA    0.00589800
AERONET_AOD GSFC	20230309_121903 38.9925  -76.8398  87 AOD	NA 1020.00 NA    0.01574700

Environment

Describe your runtime environment:
1. Machine: Linux Workstation, seneca
2. OS: RedHat Linux
3. Software version number(s): MET v11.0 and v11.1

To Reproduce

Describe the steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. bin/ascii2nc /d1/projects/METplus/discussions/1888/Discussion1888/20230309.lev15 test_aeronet.nc -format aeronetv3
  2. <MET_BASE>/utility/print_pointnc2ascii.py test_aeronet.nc > dump_aeronet.txt
  3. Check the lat/lon/elv of Tucson and GSFC

Post relevant sample data following these instructions:
https://dtcenter.org/community-code/model-evaluation-tools-met/met-help-desk#ftp

Relevant Deadlines

List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.

Funding Source

Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.

Define the Metadata

Assignee

  • Select engineer(s) or no engineer required
  • Select scientist(s) or no scientist required

Labels

  • Select component(s)
  • Select priority
  • Select requestor(s)

Projects and Milestone

  • Select Organization level Project for support of the current coordinated release
  • Select Repository level Project for development toward the next official release or add alert: NEED PROJECT ASSIGNMENT label
  • Select Milestone as the next bugfix version

Define Related Issue(s)

Consider the impact to the other METplus components.

Bugfix Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Complete the issue definition above, including the Time Estimate and Funding Source.
  • Fork this repository or create a branch of main_<Version>.
    Branch name: bugfix_<Issue Number>_main_<Version>_<Description>
  • Fix the bug and test your changes.
  • Add/update log messages for easier debugging.
  • Add/update unit tests.
  • Add/update documentation.
  • Push local changes to GitHub.
  • Submit a pull request to merge into main_<Version>.
    Pull request: bugfix <Issue Number> main_<Version> <Description>
  • Define the pull request metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
    Select: Organization level software support Project for the current coordinated release
    Select: Milestone as the next bugfix version
  • Iterate until the reviewer(s) accept and merge your changes.
  • Delete your fork or branch.
  • Complete the steps above to fix the bug on the develop branch.
    Branch name: bugfix_<Issue Number>_develop_<Description>
    Pull request: bugfix <Issue Number> develop <Description>
    Select: Reviewer(s) and Development issue
    Select: Repository level development cycle Project for the next official release
    Select: Milestone as the next official version
  • Close this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

Status

✅ Done

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions