Skip to content

Conversation

Alexhuszagh
Copy link
Contributor

Simplifies the config.rs and cross_toml.rs to have more reusable functions, and implement logic in terms of these functions, so we can add more config options in the future. This also simplifies maintenance, since we can use 1-line logic for most config variables now.

@Alexhuszagh Alexhuszagh added the no changelog A valid PR without changelog (no-changelog) label Jun 9, 2022
@Alexhuszagh Alexhuszagh requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2022 16:14
@Alexhuszagh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alexhuszagh commented Jun 9, 2022

I'm going to be using this as the basis of fixing #773 (branch for a future PR here), and then implementing a new version of #449 (and also like SSH passthrough), since this makes adding new bool config values much easier.

Copy link
Member

@Emilgardis Emilgardis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome!

I don't like the look of having long-named Fn constraints, instead I think it's more readable if they are just impl bounds.

@Alexhuszagh
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've changed all the generic Fn constraints to impl Fn, and then also changed the Vec<String> returns to &[String].

Simplifies the `config.rs` and `cross_toml.rs` to have more reusable
functions, and implement logic in terms of these functions, so we can
add more config options in the future. This also simplifies maintenance,
since we can use 1-line logic for most config variables now.
@otavio otavio requested a review from Emilgardis June 10, 2022 15:34
@otavio otavio added this to the v0.2.2 milestone Jun 10, 2022
@Alexhuszagh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Emilgardis Any chance I can get a review on this? I'm working on adding build-std support on top of this. Should I merge this in with the patch for #773 into one PR?

Copy link
Member

@Emilgardis Emilgardis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! I do feel there's more simplification possible here, but this is a nice step forward.

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 10, 2022

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 302320e into cross-rs:main Jun 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no changelog A valid PR without changelog (no-changelog)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants