Skip to content

Conversation

simonjjones
Copy link

As discussed on Slack (https://concourseci.slack.com/archives/general/p1452624733008350) we would like to tighten our security group rules for the internal security group. Further to the discussion, it appears we needed to add access from the WebSecurityGroup as well as those mentioned.

Allow only the following sources to connect to InternalSecurityGroup on tcp and udp: InternalSecurityGroup, WebSecurityGroup, BOSHSecurityGroup.

The current configuration (InternalSecurityGroup is open to all sources on every port) causes amazon trusted advisor to raise a red warning.

Signed-off-by: Simon Jones simon@cloudcredo.com

Allow only the following sources to connect to InternalSecurityGroup on tcp and
udp: InternalSecurityGroup, WebSecurityGroup, BOSHSecurityGroup.

The current configuration (InternalSecurityGroup is open to all sources on
every port) causes amazon trusted advisor to raise a red warning.

Signed-off-by: Simon Jones <simon@cloudcredo.com>
@concourse-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there!

We use Pivotal Tracker to provide visibility into what our team is working on. A story for this issue has been automatically created.

The current status is as follows:

  • #111594772 Restrict access to InternalSecurityGroup.

This comment, as well as the labels on the issue, will be automatically updated as the status in Tracker changes.

@vito
Copy link
Member

vito commented Jan 14, 2016

This looks good, thanks! I'm assuming you've tried it yourself?

@simonjjones
Copy link
Author

@vito We have yes, we successfully updated our existing cloud formation using this template, our concourse remains completely functional & in doing so we have removed the existing alert in Trusted Advisor.

@xoebus
Copy link
Contributor

xoebus commented Jan 22, 2016

Thanks!

efa4d44

@xoebus xoebus closed this Jan 22, 2016
vito added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2018
vmware-archive/fly#201

Submodule src/github.com/concourse/fly f9d92f5..2be951a:
  > Merge branch 'govau-unmarshalstrict'
  > Merge pull request #214 from alepee/patch-1
Submodule src/gopkg.in/yaml.v2 e4d366fc..5420a8b6:
  > Use underlying float precision when formatting floats (#353)
  > Fix typo in tab error message (#208).
  > Fix misspell of precede in ported code (#216)
  > Fix type on Marshal docs (#206).
  > Fixed typos in docstrings (#179).
  > Drop unnecessary explicit timestamp tags.
  > Fix broken test from last merge.
  > increment non-zero scanner error lines (#319)
  > Convert int to float when explicitly tagged.
  > Encode and decode arrays.
  > Fix edge case when decoding MinInt as -0b.
  > Remove mention of non-existent examples folder.
  > Fix curious assumption from the original C reader.
  > Ensure scanner has data before checking for blanks.
  > Drop invalid simple key assertion.
  > Improve map stabilization logic.
  > Fix unstable map key ordering (#195).
  > Merge pull request #336 from rogpeppe/025-go.mod
  > Merge pull request #335 from rogpeppe/024-merge-devel
  > Merge pull request #253 from heldtogether/patch-1
  > Merge pull request #308 from rogpeppe/016-revert-v2-PR273
  > Merge pull request #273 from rogpeppe/006-timestamps
  > Merge pull request #299 from rogpeppe/009-gofmt
  > Merge pull request #281 from houshengbo/fix-incorrect-line-number
  > Correct documentation for Marshal (#287)
  > Merge pull request #289 from rliebz/null-fix
  > Replace LICENSE text with actual license (#274)
  > Merge pull request #272 from rogpeppe/005-cleaner-tag-scan
  > Merge pull request #103 from andreychernih/bugfix/non-specific-tags
  > Merge pull request #271 from rogpeppe/004-embedded-example
  > Merge pull request #94 from mvo5/feature/embeded-structs-example
  > Merge pull request #264 from hiveminded/v2
  > Merge pull request #262 from wupeka/v2
  > Remove unreachable code to fix go vet (#249)
  > Fix dead URL for yaml specification (#240)
  > Tighten restrictions on float decoding (#171)
  > Fix decode test for Go 1.8 (#217)
  > Fix unmarshaler handling of empty strings.
  > new license in the README file (#189)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants