Skip to content

Conversation

uzaxirr
Copy link
Contributor

@uzaxirr uzaxirr commented Apr 10, 2025

No description provided.

uzaxirr added 2 commits April 9, 2025 17:17
The ListDiskImages function now accepts an optional includeCustom parameter to filter custom disk images.
@uzaxirr uzaxirr requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2025 01:14
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

disk_image.go:34

  • [nitpick] The JSON key for image size is 'image_size_bytes' in the request struct but 'image_size' in the response struct. Consider aligning these names for consistency if it fits the API design.
ImageSize    int64  `json:"image_size_bytes"` // Changed from image_size to image_size_bytes

uzaxirr and others added 2 commits April 14, 2025 15:37
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@uzaxirr uzaxirr requested a review from Copilot April 16, 2025 09:37
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

disk_image.go:48

  • [nitpick] The 'ImageSize' field in CreateDiskImageResponse uses a JSON tag 'image_size', which differs from the 'image_size_bytes' tag used in CreateDiskImageParams. Consider aligning these tags for consistency.
ImageSize    int64  `json:"image_size"`

Copy link
Member

@alessandroargentieri alessandroargentieri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alessandroargentieri alessandroargentieri merged commit 149efb1 into master Apr 16, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants