Skip to content

Change CrossVersion.full to use CrossVersion.patch for Typelevel Scala compatibility. #580

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2017

Conversation

ClydeMachine
Copy link
Contributor

Including text from the issue at typelevel/scala#135:

To use Typelevel Scala versions which are not exactly aligned with the corresponding Lightbend Scala version (ie. because they include an additional -bin-patch-nnn suffix in their version) we need to modify project builds which use CrossVersion.full (which includes the suffix) to use CrossVersion.patch (which doesn't) where appropriate (eg. for macro-paradise and other compiler plugins).

Replaced the aforementioned, as well as updating the use of "org.scala-lang" to scalaOrganization.value in library dependencies.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 4, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #580 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #580   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.55%   82.55%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines        2000     2000           
  Branches      147      147           
=======================================
  Hits         1651     1651           
  Misses        349      349
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...re/shared/src/main/scala/io/circe/KeyDecoder.scala 43.24% <0%> (-2.71%)
...rc/main/scala/io/circe/numbers/BiggerDecimal.scala 91.35% <0%> (+0.61%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9100c32...794a790. Read the comment docs.

@travisbrown
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ClydeMachine!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants