-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
go.mod: bump golang.org/x/net to 0.36.0 #1729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
go.mod
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
module github.com/cilium/ebpf | |||
|
|||
go 1.23 | |||
go 1.23.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This runs into eaef6a7 again. I'm really quite sick of the the whole add a .0 or don't add a .0 to the go line saga xD
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd be grateful for some semi-official answer what the thing to do is for depending on a language version. I don't want to pin toolchain because I don't really understand why its necessary and it's another thing to manage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also equally confused about the meaning of the toolchain
directive on projects like these. I guess it's the toolchain version used when running go test
, etc. Maybe we can let this be managed by dependabot, because I don't see a way of configuring this in dependabot.yml. There's no ecosystem-specific configuration whatsoever, and we don't even have a gomod block in there, it's enabled through the GitHub UI.
This was generated by running: go get golang.org/x/net@v0.36.0 go mod tidy go mod edit -toolchain=none Replaces cilium#1724 Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias@cilium.io>
I force-pushed this branch to read Reading eaef6a7 again:
Seems to me like Bottom line is eaef6a7 may no longer be an issue if both |
Nevermind, I missed that |
This was generated by running:
Replaces #1724